USA Today recently
reduced staffing again, eliminating as much as 10% of its editorial ranks in another bid to cut costs amid
slowing digital revenue growth rates.
But even before the latest round of cuts, I noticed the paper was shifting toward more aggregation of other media to make up for its own diminished reporting resources.
Here's an especially vivid example from
a story this morning about the slaying of a police officer in London yesterday; as I post this, it's
USAT's lead story online. You certainly can't say the paper is falling down on attribution, based on phrasing I ran across:
the Associated Press reported
ITV News reports
The Associated Press, quoting an unidentified British official, said
The BBC, quoting unidentified sources, reported
The BBC said
identified in the British media
told The Independent
In an interview with the the Daily Telegraph
the BBC reported
Contributing: Associated Press
The question: How can USAT prosper it if shifts toward aggregation over original reporting? Please post your replies in the comments section, below. To e-mail confidentially, write jimhopkins[at]gmail[dot-com]; see Tipsters Anonymous Policy in the rail, upper right.