Thursday, January 02, 2014

Indy | Multi-tasking reporters need not apply

"If your first instinct when coming upon a crime scene is thinking about a possible lede rather than tweeting what you see, this position is not for you."

-- The Indianapolis Star, in a new advertisement seeking a breaking news reporter mostly covering cops and courts.

14 comments:

  1. How silly ads are for newspaper positions.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Gracia rarely tweets and has less than 10 Twitter followers.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nothing like getting all of the facts and verifying before you start prattling.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Immediacy before accuracy! Gotta be first, even if you're tweets are unverified bullshit that you have to correct later.

      Delete
    2. To be fair, reporting what you see with your own eyes already is verified. Police tape. Squad cars. Gawkers. Crying people. Smoke rising from a house. That doesn't mean you should reach any conclusions. You can't tweet that the crying people are victims. But you can report that you see people who are crying, and that you're going to check it out. The issue needn't be timeliness vs. accuracy. The real issue is whether people want to be bothered reading tweets about random sights and sounds before you've had a chance to make some kind of sense out of it all. Probably depends on the situation: reports of shots fired at a school? Yes. Structure fire with no reports of injuries? Probably not.

      Delete
    3. Anyone can report what they see. Paying subscribers would probably want more. Like the facts, context, a resolution, victim's status, overall impact...

      Delete
  4. I get the point, but why must newsrooms employ such a sneer when recruiting? "We are so hip to digital that we will ridicule anyone who isn't." Not only is any newsroom that still prints a paper especially disqualified from striking such a tech-superior pose, it's a simple turn-off. Who wants to work for people who employ mockery to find talent? This is not something reserved to Gannett, by the way.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Tweeting is fine, but so is trying to find out what actually happened.

    If tweeting is all we ask for, then we might as well be somebody standing behind a police line watching. Report!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Perhaps Gannett's new HR guy can enlighten those who make the hires. Trying too hard to be in touch and cutting edge can mean appearing dull and out to lunch. Not a company young folks would want to work for if they want to truly develop as reporters and writers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gannett has a new HR guy?

      Delete
  7. Tweet a photo, especially from a fire or accident scene, and tell people more info is coming later, duh. That is reporting 101. The scene or you access can change in an instant. Shoot, then ask questions.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The last thing I think about when arriving at a news scene is what my lede will be. What an absurd predicate in that ad. I start thinking of ledes when I sit down to write.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I want to know what genius posted that help wanted ad.

    ReplyDelete
  10. What this essentially means is "If you want to earn more than $25,000 a year, this job is not for you."

    ReplyDelete

Jim says: "Proceed with caution; this is a free-for-all comment zone. I try to correct or clarify incorrect information. But I can't catch everything. Please keep your posts focused on Gannett and media-related subjects. Note that I occasionally review comments in advance, to reject inappropriate ones. And I ignore hostile posters, and recommend you do, too."

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.