Monday, November 01, 2010

Blogger: New Gannett Blog is now a 'tight ship'

From a new post by Martin Langeveld on the Nieman Journalism Lab blog, published by the Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard University:

Hopkins is running a tight ship, publishing a lively blog that’s serving a useful niche both for Gannett employees and Gannett watchers. It’s a niche filled for few other U.S. newspaper publishers, and certainly none do it as well as Hopkins.

23 comments:

  1. I second that opinion. Thanks Jim.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Following is an edited version of a comment posted by Anonymous@12:43 p.m.:

    I am donating more money now!

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Here, here! Thanks, Jim.

    ReplyDelete
  6. In a comment I just removed, 12:46 p.m. wrote:

    "Jim, you left of the best part. LICK MY [XXXXX]!!!!"

    I removed your comment, because asking a certain Gannett executive to lick a certain part of your body is too off-topic.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Congratulations Jim.
    Maybe you could start posting lottery results on here. I'd trust your site since it seems you care about reporting facts and getting at the truth.
    Keep up the good work.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hahaha are you sleeping with other bloggers??

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hopkins is running a tight ship, publishing a lively blog that’s serving a useful niche both for Gannett employees and Gannett watchers.

    It’s a niche filled for few other U.S. newspaper publishers, and certainly none do it as well as Hopkins.

    Keep up the good USEFUL work, Jim!
    It's why we love coming here!

    ...signed... "A Watcher!"

    ReplyDelete
  10. Congrats Jim! Well deserved.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Woohoo, Jim!

    ReplyDelete
  12. True! Congratulations Ace!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Jim; with this positive p.r., it is high time you created a bureaucratic framework for Gannett Blog. First, think verticals and how you can sell targeted ads to target groups. I.E., the Gannett Hack vertical, the USAT Doublespeak vertical; the Crystal Palace Management vertical. You get the idea. Then, appoint vice presidents and general managers for each. Don't look at their qualifications, just the buzzwords on their resumes and the amount of ass-kissing they demonstrate. Give a select crew a nice raise and a Blog ring. You're Golden!

    ReplyDelete
  14. 8:25. Here here! Don't forget the masthead of "senior editors."

    ReplyDelete
  15. As a senior editor, I'm really getting tired of the malicious comments continously posted here. We fill an important role here. Exactly what role, I'm not sure.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Thanks Jim for all you've done to give us information when our company wouldn't, and for giving us a place to share our thoughts without fear. I suspect someday this blog will provide the foundation for a business school case study. You done good Mr. Hopkins.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I agree with you. Not all senior editors deserve a blanket flogging. As long as you aren't one who provides no direction, wisdom, coaching, support, constructive crticism, you know, all those things you'd expect from a senior editor, and you roll-up your sleeves to contribute because you know staffing is so thin, then you are ok my friend. It's those OTHERS who are getting blasted here. My advice, don't take it personally if it doesn't apply.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I think Jim's zero tolerance of trolls, homophobes and hate-mongers -- though it goes against his let the posts fall where they may ethos -- has made a big big difference.

    Sure, there is still a lot of crazy talk and questionable information, and plenty of trolls still about, but the level of intelligent comments, well-informed or not, has risen greatly.

    It is far less a peek between your fingers and see if it is a circus today experience.

    So not only do many of us thank you, but know you have our full support to remove any outright junk and hate you find. It does make a difference.

    This Blog is way more readable and credible now that the circus is gone.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Congratulations, Jim. You deserve recognition for all you do.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Jim - keep working hard and someday they may make you into a content ring!

    ReplyDelete
  21. I appreciate your good work, Jim. Wish you could find out what's what with GCI's news leadership. No one from news on the management committee? An online service (Newswatch) that's rarely updated and void of inspiration/usefulness when it is? Lack of clarity on who represents news interests (Marymont, Carroll)? Phil Currie always stood for something, including high quality work, lofty standards and laudible ethics. Seems to me he is sorely missed.

    ReplyDelete

Jim says: "Proceed with caution; this is a free-for-all comment zone. I try to correct or clarify incorrect information. But I can't catch everything. Please keep your posts focused on Gannett and media-related subjects. Note that I occasionally review comments in advance, to reject inappropriate ones. And I ignore hostile posters, and recommend you do, too."

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.