The financially troubled
non-profit foundation paid CEO
James Duff $1.6 million during his first four months on the job in 2011, a year when the
Newseum's operator ran a $47 million deficit, newly released public documents show.
 |
| Duff |
The disclosure comes with fresh warnings of financial trouble. Today, Freedom Forum laid off 20% of approximately 150 employees at the Washington museum and other programs financed by the foundation. These are just the latest cuts since the museum opened in new quarters in 2008 that cost nearly double the original $250 million construction estimate.
Foundation officials have not responded to my questions about the layoffs, which I confirmed through sources.
Even by the standards of his well-compensated predecessor, Duff's pay is a jaw dropper. Since 2000,
when spending went into overdrive, the foundation never paid retired CEO
Charles Overby that much in a single year.
Most of Duff's pay, $1.4 million, came as a contribution to his employee benefit plan. Just $182,000 was direct compensation, according to the foundation's 2011 IRS tax return, which I received from the organization under federal open records laws. It is the most recent return on file.
The return reveals a sixth consecutive year of staggering deficit spending, as Freedom Forum continued pumping money into the museum about news history that moved to its new home on Pennsylvania Avenue more than four years ago. The foundation is housed there as well.
Endowment plunges again
Combined, the foundation's annual deficits have now reached $361 million for 2006-2011 alone, tax returns show. To cover that, administrators have dipped into an endowment of stocks, bonds and other savings that should be Freedom Forum’s chief income source. As a result, the endowment's value plunged to $368 million by the end of 2011 vs. $706 million in 2006, according to the returns. (
Read the foundation's full 52-page tax return for 2011.)
 |
| Neuharth |
Freedom Forum is the original Gannett Foundation, renamed and given a new mission in 1991 under the leadership of retired Gannett Chairman and CEO
Al Neuharth. Gannett launched
a new foundation hewing to the original mission: supporting communities where the company does business. But its spending has never approached what it once was.
Duff, who is 58 years old, took over in the fall of 2011 when Overby retired as Freedom Forum's first chief executive. In his final year as CEO, the foundation paid Overby $638,000. That included $383,000 in salary, $131,000 for his benefit plan, and $125,000 in expenses.
It's unclear why Duff received such a large payment for only four months' work. Freedom Forum declined to answer any questions I posed about the tax return, including about Duff's compensation. Indeed, for five years now, foundation officials have turned aside all my questions other than to acknowledge receiving them.
In addition to leading Freedom Forum, Duff is CEO of the Newseum and the foundation’s
Diversity Institute.
 |
| Overby |
Pay beats Gates Foundation
The most Overby was ever paid in a single year was in 2005, when he got $1.3 million. That included a one-time $785,000 distribution from a supplemental retirement plan that had been discontinued, according to that year’s IRS tax return.
Duff’s $1.6 million dwarfed that of the CEO at one of the world’s biggest philanthropies: the
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, with about $35 billion in total assets. Named for Microsoft’s co-founder, the Seattle-based foundation focused on health care paid chief executive
Jeffrey Raikes $975,000 plus $80,000 in expenses in 2011, according to its IRS tax return.
To be sure, Duff and Overby weren't the only administrators paid richly by the foundation, which has a long-standing reputation as a haven for retired Gannett executives.
Neuharth, who is 88 years old, got $525,000 as the foundation's founder, roughly the same as the year before. That included a $225,000 salary and $290,000 for expenses. As in the past, the tax return said he worked an average 40 hours a week. It did not spell out his duties.
Ken Paulson, who was briefly in line to succeed Overby until
a management shake-up two years ago, was paid $368,000 in salary and $118,000 in benefits and expenses as CEO of the
First Amendment Center in Nashville. That was 10% less than in 2010. Paulson was
USA Today's top editor before joining the foundation in 2008.
John Seigenthaler, founder of the First Amendment Center, got $200,000, plus another $93,000 for expenses and benefits. He is
USAT's first editorial director and a former editor of
The Tennessean in Nashville.
And
John Quinn got $150,000, plus $121,000 for expenses, as advisor to the foundation. He leads a scholarship program for minority students financed by the foundation. Quinn was editor of
USAT and retired as head of Gannett's News Department.
A financial black hole
Neuharth retained control of the original Gannett Foundation even after retiring from the media giant. He pressured Gannett to buy back some $650 million in company stock that was the entirety of the foundation's endowment, then gave it a new name and mission to transform it into a global journalism philanthropy.
 |
| Exterior of Newseum |
But in 2000, he and Overby shifted gears, focusing the entire foundation's philanthropy on one project: the Newseum. As much as a promoter of the First Amendment, the museum is meant to be a lasting physical legacy of Neuharth's life and career.
Opened years late and at a cost of $450 million, the museum now accounts for virtually all the foundation's annual gifts to non-profits.
In 2011, the foundation gave $30 million to the museum out of a total $32 million in contributions. It spent another $23 million on expenses that included among the largest categories: salaries, wages and benefits ($7.2 million), professional fees ($5.5 million) and depreciation ($4.4 million).
Overall, spending dropped 17% from $66 million in 2010. And that lowered the annual deficit to $46.8 million from $55 million the year before.
But the endowment once more heaved. By 2011's end, the value of the foundation's stocks, bonds and other non-real estate assets fell 13% to $368 million. That was in a year when the overall stock market was unchanged, based on the widely followed S&P 500 index.
The endowment's present value isn't public; the 2012 tax return won't be filed until well into next year. (
This spreadsheet shows selected financial data for Freedom Forum for 2000, plus 2006-2011.)
The Newseum has struggled to find its place in a city bursting with tourist attractions. Many of Washington's museums, such as the better-known Smithsonian, offer free admission. In contrast, the Newseum's
regular adult tickets are $21.95. Admissions generated just $7.1 million in 2011 vs. $6.5 million the year before. Meanwhile, expenses totaled $71 million in 2011.
Still, it's not unusual for cultural institutions to get only a fraction of their revenue from admissions, relying instead on donations and fees as special event venues. For example, the Newseum has
sold out its $100 admission packages for the Jan. 21 presidential inauguration parade, which will be staged outside along Pennsylvania Avenue.
A shift in fundraising
In a sign Duff is concerned about finances, the foundation in July
hired a new senior vice president of development: Courtney Surls. She had been a development vice president at the University of Southern California, where she worked on the school's $6 billion fundraising campaign.
Today, my tipster tells me Surls has been given an aggressive fundraising target that, even if successful, won’t erase the deficit spending without further cutbacks in overhead. That includes today’s reported 20% workforce reduction.
When it opened, the museum alone had 300 workers. After
a second layoff, in 2009, the figure had fallen to about 180. It is a legally separate entity from Freedom Forum, but there is considerable overlap between
the museum's trustees and those overseeing the foundation. One of the most high-profile joint trustees is PBS correspondent
Judy Woodruff.
 |
| Jan Neuharth |
Since Duff's arrival, the foundation has shown little signs of governance reform.
A year ago, the board of trustees elected Neuharth's daughter,
Jan Neuharth, as chairman to replace Overby -- continuing her family's control over what's supposed to be a guardian of money for the broader public good. The insular
12-person board still includes Overby, plus Duff and several other long-time retainers of the elder Neuharth.
Jan Neuharth was paid $51,000 in 2011. She wasn't elected chairman until December of that year, so it's unclear whether any of her compensation reflected her expanded responsibilities.
Duff, a former attorney, came to Freedom Forum with little experience in philanthropy or museum administration. He had previously directed administrative operations for the U.S. federal courts from July 2006 until September 2011, when he took over as the Freedom Forum's CEO.
At the time, the foundation
said in a news release that it conducted a nationwide search before choosing him. His qualifications appear to have been his role as legal counsel and secretary to Freedom Forum and the Newseum, when he was a partner at the Washington firm of
Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz.
The foundation's 2011 tax return doesn't identify its law firm. However, former U.S. Sen.
Howard Baker, who is senior counsel at Baker Donelson, is Freedom Forum's secretary, according to the return.
It's noteworthy that, while Freedom Forum's overall spending fell in 2011, legal costs soared to $871,000 from $284,000 in 2010. No explanation was provided, however, and the foundation declined my request for more details.