Thursday, July 09, 2009

Thursday | Your Layoff News & Comments

Real Time Comments is parked here, 24/7. (Earlier editions.) Through midnight ET tomorrow, I'll keep a tally of job cuts, as you post in the comments section, below. As of 2:49 p.m. ET today. When possible, I'm relying on publisher's memos for these figures.

Newspapers
Reporting in: 25
Estimated jobs cut: 604

TV stations
Reporting in: 1
Estimated jobs cut: 2

Please post your replies in the comments section, below. To e-mail confidentially, write gannettblog[at]gmail[dot-com]; see Tipsters Anonymous Policy in the green rail, upper right.

Part 4 | Thursday's Layoff News & Comments

This section is now closed to new comments. Please go to Part 5.

Part 3 | Thursday's Layoff News & Comments

This section is now closed to new comments. Please go to Part 4.

Part 2 | Thursday's Layoff News & Comments

This section is now closed to new comments. Please go to Part 3.

Part 1 | Thursday's Layoff News & Comments

This section is now closed to new comments. Please go to Part 2.

Urgent: Gannett layoffs, job cuts rocket past 600; hundreds more seen today as mass layoff spreads; at 2 p.m. ET, severance details remain elusive

[Gannett's portfolio: 102 U.S. and U.K. dailies, 23 TV stations]

Updated at 2:49 p.m. today. For the latest numbers, please see the layoff tracker, top of page. This is the fifth and last in Gannett Blog's Roll Call series, where employees tally layoffs and other unannounced payroll cuts by the nation's No. 1 newspaper publisher: Gannett Co.

We've been here before: More than 300 jobs in May and April. At least 2,200 in December. Approximately 100 directors in September. And the first big one: 1,000, last August. Overall, Gannett employs 41,500 worldwide. (Employment by division.)

Check out Gannettoid.com!
See the companion layoff tracker recently introduced by Gannettoid.com, the site I'm recommending you start visiting early and off, as I prepare to shut down Gannett Blog permanently on July 10. Please go there, and post now!

Now, from Alexandria, La., to Wilmington, Del., we say goodbye to more co-workers. Including 85 U.S. dailies, 17 dailies in the U.K., GCI subsidiaries have now said they plan to eliminate the following jobs in this round, which began at The News-Press in Fort Myers, Fla.

Using the following format, please post your worksite's figures in the comments section, below. ??? indicates missing or incomplete information. Cities are newspaper sites.To e-mail confidentially, write gannettblog[at]gmail[dot-com]; see Tipsters Anonymous Policy in the green rail, upper right.

Gillin | Problem: 'No one wants to pay watchdogs'

Social media author and consultant Paul Gillin has entered the important debate about why there aren't more bloggers watching major media. It's unfolding on yesterday's Nieman Journalism Lab post by Martin Langeveld: Adios, Gannett Blog; where are the rest of the watchblogs? From Paul's comment today:

It’s clear that Gannett Blog's success was a surprise to everyone, including Jim Hopkins. As activity exploded, he was faced with the difficult decision of whether to try to take the blog’s celebrity to the next level or keep it as an interesting sidelight. Jim tried to make a run at a sustainable financial model last fall through a kind of tip jar approach, but that ran into the same problems that all publishers encounter these days: people don’t want to pay for news.

Faced with the prospect of continuing to sustain the effort on a labor of love basis while also becoming a lightning rod for criticism, Jim made a reasonable decision in my view. If he’s been a little dramatic in winding down the operation, I can understand that. Gannett Blog has provided a valuable service for many Gannett employees for two years, but no one is willing or able to step up and support the effort. It’s not surprising that Jim is pointing out what they’re about to lose.

Whether or not you agree with the way Jim has handled comments from readers, it’s clear that this blog has taxed the limits of one man’s ability to give without compensation. He deserves thanks and respect for all he is put into the effort.

To address Martin’s comment about the lack of watchdogs, the problem is that no one wants to pay watchdogs. My own blogging activities on Newspaper Death Watch have consumed hundreds of hours of time over the last 27 months while yielding a few hundred dollars in advertising revenue and no meaningful business opportunities. That’s okay. I do it because I love it, but if my family’s livelihood were ever at stake, it’s the first activity I would have to jettison.

That’s where this story is also a microcosm of the industry. Newspapers are the watchdogs of our institutions, but their financial predicament makes that role less and less viable. It would be nice to look to the blogosphere for salvation, but those who choose a watchdog role must also face up to the realities of the market. New media has yet to figure out a viable financial model for watchdogs, and it may never do so. For the time being, we are increasingly delegating that function to people like Jim Hopkins, who can only give so much.

Please post your replies in the comments section, below. To e-mail confidentially, write gannettblog[at]gmail[dot-com]; see Tipsters Anonymous Policy in the green rail, upper right.

USAT | 'Like watching a disaster. Blessings to us all'

Anonymous@1:04 p.m. writes:

I work at USA Today and like everyone else in the company we are sitting here reading these hundreds of postings in great sadness and disbelief. Trust me, many of us came from the very newspapers we're reading about and the layoffs show an industry disintegrating.
No one here feels safe or smug and all I can say that the image of us sitting here in the hundreds is very wrong. Also, we care and we feel the carnage.

It's like watching a disaster movie. Blessings to us all.

Layoff traffic | A retrospective look: past 30 days

[Yesterday: 19,211 visits. 53,433 pageviews; click to enlarge]

[Image: Google Analytics]

Karma | What goes around, comes around

Please post your replies in the comments section, below. To e-mail confidentially, write gannettblog[at]gmail[dot-com]; see Tipsters Anonymous Policy in the green rail, upper right.

[Image: courtesy of an anonymous Gannett Blog reader]

Op View | 'I am one of those who get to tell people they are gone. I didn't get to say who -- I was told'

Anonymous@10:10 a.m. writes:

These people are my friends and valued co-workers. If I had any options, I'd quit -- but I wouldn't even get unemployment then.

I am furious that it has come to this, and I blame top management for a lot of it. The economy has a part, but the string of stupid decisions that have come from corporate are unforgiveable. They have forgotten, or never cared, that we have an obligation and a reponsibility that go beyond just making a dollar. And they never wanted to hear anyone question the decisions. If you dared, you were told that perhaps you worked for the wrong company -- which turns out to be true.

Some of the other media companies that went down at least went down trying to maintain standards. Gannett is going down as if planned. Who will profit from that? I think it is a question that should be thoroughly investigated.

Those of you are gone or leaving today, I am so sorry. But it is likely to be worse for those left behind.

A look in someone's eyes. A cardboard box on an empty desk. A final conversation. Please share your layoff story in three or four paragraphs. Post replies in the comments section, below. Or e-mail via gannettblog[at]gmail[dot-com]; see Tipsters Anonymous Policy in the green sidebar, upper right.

Just in | This is your layoff, on Internet time

"It's happening in Cherry Hill RIGHT NOW."


-- Anonymous@9:32 a.m., as comments roll in by the dozens amid a coast-to-coast layoff by No. 1 newspaper publisher Gannett Co. Inc.

Silent stream | In comments, real-time layoffs

In reverse chronological order, from 8:23 a.m. to 9:21 a.m. today:

Who who who . . . Asbury Park just lost some long timers!! . . . Northeast Wisconsin learns today? . . . They have started in Des Moines. . . . Waiting here in Cherry Hill. The mood is somber. . . . Damnit this is horrible. They continue to make us suffer what creeps. . . . In Louisville, more names dropping Thursday. . . . The dawn is breaking on another work day. . . . . They are coming to take me away aha. They are coming to take me away aha. . . .The numbers will grow. Rochester will not finish until today or possibly Friday. . . . Northing happened in Poughkeepsie yesterday. People are getting more anxious by the minute. . . . Any word from Asheville or Greenville?

[Image: The Scream, Edvard Munch, 1893, oil, tempera and pastel on cardboard. National Gallery, Oslo]

Confidential to new P.R. chief Robin Pence

If you haven't had the conversation already, please contact Tara Connell ASAP, about our April 4, 2008, e-mail exchange. I have recently re-extended that olive branch. Yet, it appears her allies still haven't gotten aboard. Don't be blindsided so early in your tenure. I am busy. So are you. It's time to move on.

Resources for journalists covering layoff underway

A selection of key documents, and other links:

Related websites
Please post your replies in the comments section, below. To e-mail confidentially, write gannettblog[at]gmail[dot-com]; see Tipsters Anonymous Policy in the green rail, upper right.

Tips | Advice from those laid off before you

Please share your experience as a laid-off employee, so those going through this in coming weeks can benefit from what you learned.

Earlier: A Gannett Blog layoff FAQ

Please post your replies in the comments section, below. To e-mail confidentially, write gannettblog[at]gmail[dot-com]; see Tipsters Anonymous Policy in the green rail, upper right.