data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4def4/4def414f2e69b47990ea21f9e503f877c1f7f17e" alt=""
Please post your replies in the comments section, below. To e-mail confidentially, write jimhopkins[at]gmail[dot-com].
An independent journal about the Gannett Co. and the news industry's digital transition
Jim says: "Proceed with caution; this is a free-for-all comment zone. I try to correct or clarify incorrect information. But I can't catch everything. Please keep your posts focused on Gannett and media-related subjects. Note that I occasionally review comments in advance, to reject inappropriate ones. And I ignore hostile posters, and recommend you do, too."
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
Gannett should at least be forced to let the name of the paper be sold.
ReplyDeleteI'm confused and would appreciate some clarification. I'm afraid I completely understand why Gannett or any company would discontinue business at a loss with no sign of hope or recovery. That said, if Gannett makes $10Mil per year via the JOA, why didn't they close the paper long ago, for example when operating revenue fell below $10Mil per year?
ReplyDeleteI'm hoping G loses and the Citizen sticks around in some meaningful way. But I don't know what standing the AZ AG has in this case since DoJ signed off on G's plans.
ReplyDeleteThe folks in Tucson, the first Gannett property in AZ, have been on the short end of the G stick for years now, every since the company bought the Republic.
http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/daily/frontpage/116726.php
ReplyDeleteDENIED!
How sad!
Something is fishy, Why would Lee pay Gannet profits if the JOA was canceled on Saturday and they are the only ticket in town? The ad rates will still be the same without the Citizen.
ReplyDelete