Saturday, April 04, 2009

How thousands of employees were reduced to ???

During the big newspaper workforce reduction in December, two Gannett dailies each cut fewer than 75 jobs. But the consequences for one were far greater, a fact we understood right away because of a crucial piece of data that's no longer readily available -- total employment at each site.

The Des Moines Register cut 70 jobs, while Michigan's Battle Creek Enquirer cut 50. Those Register cuts were out of a workforce of 800 people, however. The Battle Creek paper employed just 105 it shuttered production, and moved printing to the Lansing State Journal.

You'll see a lot of ??? in lieu of workforce totals in our new list of paper-by-paper job reductions. That's because Corporate has now removed nearly all the workforce figures that were once listed on each paper's official profile page -- along with the publisher's name, a street address, and other vital information. (The workforce figures appear untouched on the TV station profile pages.)

Fact is, many of the newspaper employment figures were incorrect, because they weren't updated after the August layoffs. Maybe Corporate decided it was too much work to update pages after each round of cuts. Reflecting the reality of the situation, someone simply erased thousands of jobs from public view. Now n building our new list, I'll do my best to restore those numbers.

Please post your replies in the comments section, below. To e-mail confidentially, write gannettblog[at]gmail[dot-com]; see Tipsters Anonymous Policy in the green rail, upper right.

[Image: screenshot of
Enquirer homepage]

2 comments:

  1. The interesting peice of this is that the real numbers won't have to be published until next years annual report. This years numbers are not reflective of what is currently going on.
    My verification word is ventspa as in I wento Jims Spa to vent.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Checked some couple of the Broadcast pages: No job totals seen for KUSA, DC, Little Rock, Buffalo, Grand Rapids, Minneapolis... but the job total shows intact for the first one on the page, Phoenix

    ReplyDelete

Jim says: "Proceed with caution; this is a free-for-all comment zone. I try to correct or clarify incorrect information. But I can't catch everything. Please keep your posts focused on Gannett and media-related subjects. Note that I occasionally review comments in advance, to reject inappropriate ones. And I ignore hostile posters, and recommend you do, too."

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.