Tuesday, June 21, 2011

Nashville | Cutting 20 news jobs will help 'deepen the paper's legacy of public service journalism'

The Tennessean laid off 14 employees today, and plans to reorganize the newsroom this summer. The cuts are among 700 across the U.S. newspaper division. Word-for-word excerpts from the newspaper's just-published story about the newsroom changes:

Silverman
Publisher Carol Hudler and editor Mark Silverman announced that news operations will be refocused to better meet changing print and digital needs in Middle Tennessee. It is expected that about 20 news positions will be lost through unfilled positions and layoffs as a part of those changes later this summer.

The news changes will help The Tennessean continue and deepen the newspaper’s legacy of public service journalism, improve the breadth and reach of local news in Nashville and its suburban counties, and continue to establish The Tennessean as the region’s primary source of digital news, information and engagement.

"We will sharpen our focus and concentrate our staff resources on the issues and topics our audiences are most passionate about," said Silverman. "At the same time, we will seek opportunities to partner with groups and individuals to provide additional information."

Earlier: Silverman wins Ben Bradlee editor award.

36 comments:

  1. Silverman should return his award. There is no way he can follow through on such a farcical statement.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  3. A corporate toady until the end (or until retirement age and moving back to Va). Lies. Money talks when you are trapped.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This would be edited out or not allowed to stand without other views if the story was about any other important local institution. Credibility takes a hit.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Total and utter bullsh*t said to keep one's job. Gannett editors are very good at this.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This statement just makes me want to throw up.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Um... What?
    That's insane.
    Less people can produce more & better?
    I'm glad I don't work for Gannett any more.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Mark Silverman is a duplicitous, worthless POS. He was at corporate, he was in Louisville, he was in Detroit, he clearly still is...

    ReplyDelete
  9. That is fucking unbelievable.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Isn't that a lovely way to say "thanks for making the Tennessean a Pulitzer finalist this year, guys!"

    You made us feel worthless today, Tennessean.

    You broke our hearts.

    ReplyDelete
  11. It's good to know they speak this stupid shit across other sites too. Do they really think the people working for them have no brains and will not read through the B.S.? Cutbacks like this do NOT improve ANYTHING. Ask your readers and advertisers what they think of all the cutbacks in recent years.

    Oh right, you don't have to - simply look at the revenue decline. Where they spend their money speaks VOLUMES.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Has Mark ever taken on or criticized corporate directives or actions? Has he ever taken on the establishment internally putting his reputation on the line to oppose anything? Just share and educate me.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hudler tells us that once they've whacked 16 percent of the newsroom staff, they'll be replacing us with freelancers.

    That's a one-way ticket to deep public service journalism, right there.

    ReplyDelete
  14. The Tallahassee Florida Democrat has been pushing this same TOADY line of bullshit from Gannett corporate for 5 years now as well. Lying, making stuff up and firing off the real newspeople, and replacing them with inexperienced newbies who are learning their craft at the community's expense creating a severe lack of cogent & intelligent news. Tallahassee is suffering from their mistakes now, and will for the foreseeable future because of the misdeeds Gannett & toady editors commit against their readers.

    ReplyDelete
  15. The Egyptian government was overthrown by a text on Twitter. Why can't we get rid of Dubow and all these spineless editors in the same matter?
    We are stockholders lay them off.

    ReplyDelete
  16. "Deepen the newspaper’s legacy of public service journalism, and improve the breadth and reach of local news in Nashville." Can someone explain to me how cutting jobs will deepen the newspapers legacy of public journalism? Do you actually believe this BS Mark?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Something's DEEP alright. In DEEP shit. DEEP denial.

    ReplyDelete
  18. What dumbass thinks that replacing reporters with " partner with groups and individuals to provide additional information" will work. Middle Tennessee residents deserves better. Craig Moon where are you?

    ReplyDelete
  19. I just want to know how The Tennessean can keep touting growing readership numbers when everyone I know has cancelled their subscriptions. Funny how circulation numbers are no longer mentioned, isn't it? Oh, and the first one on the layoff list should be managing editor Meg Downey. Now that's a waste of a salary.

    ReplyDelete
  20. And... at 2:23 a.m. local time, the hardest working person in the Tennessean's newsroom, the comment policer, deleted all 19 comments that were there earlier, and not all of them were even remotely offensive or did not meet the "standards" one is supposed to follow to post comments. Chickenshits can't handle people telling them WHY they stopped reading/subscribing/etc. Built-in focus group, ignored.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Just when you think it can't get any worse, it just did, with Silverman's stupid comments.

    Would it be so hard to just say, "We're struggling right now, and our CEO would rather collect a big bonus than pay people. I'm sorry we have to lose a lot of hard-working employees."

    Dubow wouldn't like it. But oh well. If that comment would upset him ... then don't be collecting bonuses on workers' backs.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Silly rabbits, the comment police don't work in Nashville! We outsourced that job! There's a robotic arm punching "delete" somewhere in Nebraska or Bangalore or somesuch.

    Soon, they'll outsource the reporting to robotic arms as well. Freelance robotic arms. $25 bucks an article. No health benefits.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Other than adding a few positions recently, was there ONE SINGLE cut from the corporate staff or even a token of salary cuts? Very doubtful.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Oh, and the person who keeps sniping anonymously at Meg Downey across the boards... what the hell? If I were going to spew anonymous bile at a manager, she wouldn't even make my short list.

    Not that I would spew anonymous bile. Because that's mean, and there's enough mean floating around the Tennessean newsroom on a daily basis as it is.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Downey had a good career and respect during her years at Poughkeepsie. She could keep some distance from abusive, sick Osenenko and sidekick Shinske. Don't know if she was forced into the partnership from hell with Silverman or was willing to go. Either way, it destroyed her reputation.

    ReplyDelete
  26. LOL!

    It's obvious that Silverman has great potential as an Obama speech writer. At least January 2013.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Using Silverman's logic, the best way to fulfill my dream of becoming a major league pitcher is to cut three fingers off of my right hand...

    ReplyDelete
  28. That newsroom is already decimated. Reporters there feel it's nearly impossible to perform under the circumstances. It's each man for himself in that sinking ship. Not to mention it's hard to take seriously a leader who has gotten involved with some questionable people - sorrysilverman.com

    ReplyDelete
  29. I think they meant to say "deep-six the newspaper’s legacy of public service journalism."

    ReplyDelete
  30. Here's how they plan to fill the paper now ... Free contributors to the opinion page. Want to guess when they will make the same offer for A1 space?

    http://www.tennessean.com/article/20110626/OPINION/306260045/Win-spot-newspaper-columnist?odyssey=mod|newswell|text|FRONTPAGE|s

    Want to be heard? Enter The Tennessean’s opinion writing contest and win the opportunity to write a weekly column for eight weeks.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Nashville Scene did a spectacular profile of Silverman in 2008, and he's still reeling from it:
    http://www.nashvillescene.com/pitw/archives/2008/02/18/a-spectacular-doofus-a-brief-look-at-mark-silvermans-long-career

    ReplyDelete
  32. Looks like when MS said layoffs from newsroom reorganization would come "later this summer," he actually meant "next week."

    I can see how he might get those confused.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Just how will fewer reporters/editors deepen coverage? This kind of statement is offensive to the intelligence not only of journalists but of ANYONE, whether a reader or not. A columnist let go several years ago walked in to a staff meeting just after being fired and told people not to trust the Tennessean. She said the paper had no loyalty whatsoever to journalists who had worked there, and worked hard, for years. She was right.

    ReplyDelete
  34. 8:59: The only coverage that's getting deeper at the Tennessean is the manure being spread around by Deal Chicken.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Silverman has long been a nasty corporate puppet who followed the G A N N E T T dictum that execs should watch their asses and blame underlings for anything that goes wrong.

    I wouldn't buy a pack of gum from Silverman let alone a used car!

    ReplyDelete
  36. When I had got the position as a BLANK YEARS AGO the wage was ok at the time, MANY YEARS LATER WITH NO RAISE GETS OLD REAL FAST ‘NO APPRETIATION”. They always have the same excuses business is slow we don’t have the money right now. But yet they hire people off the street making more than you. COMPANY HAS NO WORK ETHICS. DOES NOT CARE ABOUT THE PEOPLE THAT WORK THERE ALREADY. COMPNAY IS A JOKE.
    The companies that they secure now they try so hard to hold on to them by making up excuses all the time on everything. Making comments like oh yes were going to get X amount of hours here soon cuz were just such a great company. WELL if that’s the case why don’t you start off by taking care of the people that are taking care of you. JOKE, JOKE JOKE.
    If you’re reading this and you debating whether or not to get this company as your security provider, think a minute if there mis-treating their own employees what will they do for you. HUMMMM makes you think.

    ReplyDelete

Jim says: "Proceed with caution; this is a free-for-all comment zone. I try to correct or clarify incorrect information. But I can't catch everything. Please keep your posts focused on Gannett and media-related subjects. Note that I occasionally review comments in advance, to reject inappropriate ones. And I ignore hostile posters, and recommend you do, too."

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.