Tuesday, October 26, 2010

Lick this! Social media, and the small advertiser

San Francisco ice cream impresarios Jack Godby and Sean Vahey were once the sort of bread-and-butter small advertisers routinely found in newspapers like The San Francisco Chronicle. But that's changing rapidly in the new world of online marketing, now dominated by free, do-it-yourself promotion, blogger Alan Mutter says in this excellent post today.

Godby and Vahey leveraged social media to build a community around their barely two-year-old Humphry Slocombe ice cream shop, which retails dozens of exotic flavors like prosciutto and beet sorbet.

The shop now has 301,384 followers on Twitter vs. the 223,539 individuals who buy the print edition of the Chronicle on an average weekday, yesterday's new circulation data show -- or the 10,639 people who follow the paper’s website on Twitter, Mutter says.

Now, watch Godby and Vahey tell their story in the following video:



Earlier: Gannett launches new start-up focused on small, midsize firms

Got an advertising story to recommend? Please post your replies in the comments section, below. To e-mail confidentially, write jimhopkins[at]gmail[dot-com]; see Tipsters Anonymous Policy in the rail, upper right.

1 comment:

  1. I know of a local wine store that did the same early on with e-mails when they first appeared. The store used to advertise their wines on sale with quarter-page or eighth-page ads in the newspapers, but the owner said he built his own customer base by simply asking customers if they wanted to be on his weekly e-mail list. He said these are customers who are interested in his wines, and participate in sales, and that he gets a much better response than putting ads in newspapers. He no longer advertises in the newspaper and saved the advertising costs.
    As Mutter points out, newspapers slept through this revolution, and are sleeping through the new direct marketing approaches using Twitter, etc. "If newspapers continue tottering along as the staid, imperious and unimaginative institutions that many of them have come to be, then get ready for the third decade in a row of continuously shriveling circulation."
    He's quite right. Gannett woke up to this much too late, and now the new technology is eating our lunch. When they write the history of this period in newspapering, books will show the consequences of a chronic lack of imagination.

    ReplyDelete

Jim says: "Proceed with caution; this is a free-for-all comment zone. I try to correct or clarify incorrect information. But I can't catch everything. Please keep your posts focused on Gannett and media-related subjects. Note that I occasionally review comments in advance, to reject inappropriate ones. And I ignore hostile posters, and recommend you do, too."

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.