USAT's app is available for free until July 4, after which Gannett plans to charge a yet-to-be-announced subscription fee.
The newspaper's direct rivals have plenty to worry about, too, based on current reviews of the major newspaper iPad apps on Apple's site. Following are current customer ratings for USA Today, The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal. As you can see, USAT fared better than the other two in average "stars" awarded:
NYT: average rating of 2.5 stars
The breakdown in reader votes:
- Five stars: 348 votes
- Four: 265
- Three: 374
- Two: 452
- One: 820
- Five: 622 votes
- Four: 312
- Three: 632
- Two: 1,136
- One: 6,005
- Five stars: 1,042 votes
- Four: 569
- Three: 581
- Two: 510
- One: 1,094
Oh come on. It's far too early to make any sort of judgement over whether the i-pad app will take off. The technology needs to be universally adopted - we are talking years not days ffs!
ReplyDeleteAgreed. Imagine if we had run out and built iPhone apps one month after the launch.
ReplyDeleteYears!. It took facebook less than a year to have more visitors to their site than it has taken Gannett's 100 newspapers and 23 broadcast stations and USA Today over the past 10 years!!!
ReplyDeleteUSA Today iPad app will not be paid for when someone on a 3G iPad will be able to hop over to the safari browser and just read the news for free.
Once again I see a disconnect between what Jim posts and the headline he writes.
ReplyDeleteWhere is the "discontent'' with USA TODAY's iPad app in early reviews, as stated in the headline?? In fact, he has posted the opposite, that USA TODAY's reviews are better than those of its competitors.
Sure, someone posted that strategy is in disarray, and there are negative reviews in some places out there. But they are not mentioned in this item!
Is Jim incapable of crediting USA TODAY with doing something right when the data he shows demonstrates just that?
Really undercuts the entire blog when time after time Jim bends over backwards to say the negative even in the (admittedly), rare cases when there is something positive.
As I noted, USAT earned a higher average rating than the NYT and the WSJ. Nonetheless, USAT's app got 1,094 low, single-star ratings. That represents lots of unhappy customers.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteSo there's eleven hundred single star votes. How many tens of thousands of USA downloads do you think there have been since the app launched? Why does Apple feature USAT on its website? Come on Jim....give credit where credit is due. Your lack of credibility is showing
ReplyDeleteLike most journalists, I'm paid to be skeptical. Readers come to me for the news and opinions that Corporate doesn't provide.
ReplyDeleteAs to your question: I don't know how many USAT iPad apps have been downloaded. We've been told the number is declining.
Do you have these figures, 6:44?
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteHmmm, Robin Pence's staff to the rescue???? LOL!
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure there is discontent with apps as much as there is discontent with the iPad itself. You trade a lot away to use an iPad and what you get in return just doesn't seem to be worth it. It's just no big thing in a world already overcrowded with gadgets vying for our all-too-limited attention.
ReplyDeleteAlso you don't seem crazy to me. Just on a hunt for the truth that can lead down blind alleys and dead ends.
You don't want to know what Jim does in blind alleys.
ReplyDeleteWhat kindergarten did you escape from? Where's your mama?
ReplyDeleteJim has uncovered yet another example of corporate ineptness. You would think with something as important as the IPad ap, corporate would make sure they got it right. They didn't, and who is to blame? Jim for uncovering the evidence, or the execs at digital, or corporate?
ReplyDeleteI use it. It is okay with text, but way too slow with graphics and pix.
ReplyDelete"USAT: average 3 stars"
ReplyDeleteDoesn't look like they got it wrong to me.
You and Jim should read a little more closely.
3 stars aint bad. it ain't good, either.
ReplyDeleteUse it. Compare to the NYT. You will see the problem.
ReplyDeleteAll these apps will get better as new versions are released. I only wish they were already getting unequivocally rave reviews.
ReplyDeleteA note of caution, however: An iPad owner told me this week that he doesn't need apps, since he can browse his way to, for example, USAT's homepage, where he can read it for free. So, a subscription-based app must offer something more than what's already available for free on the Web.
MacWorld.com gives the USATODAY iPad app a 2 1/2 mouse out of 5 rating. Average.
ReplyDeleteWhy would anyone pay for news on an iPad when they won't pay online using a laptop? It makes no sense. This will only further accelerate the rate of decline for newsprint. Tough Business to be in.
On a technical note, Steve Jobs/Apple won't allow the Flash plug-in for the iPad and iPhone. I counted 2 advertisers and a video that required Flash on the USAT 'browser' front page. Jobs says using Flash will seriously drain the battery live of its portable devices, USAT app or not.
ReplyDelete"So, a subscription-based app must offer something more than what's already available for free on the Web."
ReplyDeleteJim is going to get rich with this sort of helpful business advice. Next: He tells automakers they need to make better cars.
He'll corner the market of really obvious advice dispensed by lunatics fired from Gannett.
"3 stars aint bad. it ain't good, either."
ReplyDeleteHis headline says lots of discontent.
Both of you need to learn to read.
Jim, for your homepage I get the Living Social top banner ad on the iPhone (jpeg) and multiple sponsors that are flash-animated in Firefox.
ReplyDelete"His headline says lots of discontent.
ReplyDeleteBoth of you need to learn to read."
That would make sense IF I had written my post in reference to the headline. Here's a clue: I wasn't.
Stay average, you corporate shill.
At least get your facts right before you complain about someone else distorting them. As I recall, Jim didn't get fired. He took a buyout.
ReplyDeleteFirst, the app store ratings are a joke. You don't even need to install an app to rate it. Second, far more haters rate an app than the ones that like it. Third, it is a new product. Initial downloads will always be high and decline. Kind of like sales of the iPad - or do you call that a failure too? In this situation, it is better to be early to the game with a 3 star app than late to the game with a 5 star. Fourth, you can integrate more tightly with the iPad than you can with a website - just don't expect that integration on day 1. Fifth, some people prefer apps. Sixth, The ROI on iPad/iPod app development is ridiculously high. Seventh, the advertising opportunities on Apple's products have barely scratched the surface. This is one case where hopefully the execs need for instant gratification won't doom a product.
ReplyDelete1. - I'm an actual iPad owner, unlike half to douche-bag posters here who don't know what they're talking about yet seem to have an opinion. Very douche-y.
ReplyDelete2. - While not scientific or perhaps even reliable, the Apple store postings are a single insight into user satisfaction. But one that should have prompted an actual review.
3. - A far more reliable (and far more useful) analysis of the USAT iPad app would come from Jim eliciting, or perhaps conducting user reviews from persons who have ACTUALLY used all the apps mentioned. A story based on actual user interaction would have given all of us a much better feeling for whether the USAT app is good, bad or average.
4. - IMHO the USAT iPad app is unremarkable and does not use the platform to the fullest. I wouldn't pay for it. Nor would I subscribe to it "through" the app if it were offered. You want cool? Check out the Bloomberg or NPR apps. Even the Time app (which requires the purchase of editions) attempts to be more than a backlit print edition. How lame is it that the USAT app has the motif of a scalloped newsprint edge running across the top of the screen?
5. -
11:55 am: I read in some of the Apple site reviews that the USAT app doesn't include the technology section (which, of course, would be ironic). Is that still true in the newer editions?
ReplyDelete"A far more reliable (and far more useful) analysis of the USAT iPad app would come from Jim eliciting, or perhaps conducting user reviews from persons who have ACTUALLY used all the apps mentioned."
ReplyDeleteAre you serious? Jim doesn't do that. He just criticizes, and then follows with dumb questions that prove he has done no research. Or he will say something dumb like: "Do you have those details?"
He's a crazy person who was fired from Gannett. He might offer another version, but all the evidence points toward a dismissal.
Man, the corporate types are really pounding away at Jim here these days! The times, they must be desperate.
ReplyDeleteThe following comment was posted by Anonymous@7:29 a.m. I deleted it by accident; here it is in full:
ReplyDelete@4:33, Do you really think that your repetitive jabs at abuse are going to have a chilling effect on a free exchange of ideas this time around? You come across as a lame and desperate-for-attention individual who can't contribute anything but a useless, droning noise. After I post this, I'm joining other readers here in ignoring you. Now go away.
Actually, when Jim has to fish for deleted comments to repost them, it shows how desperate he -- and you -- are.
ReplyDeleteJim is a lunatic who was fired from Gannett. This thread shows he writes of things he knows nothing about. Does he own an iPad? No. Has he ever used one? No.
Is he crazy? Yes. Was he dismissed from Gannett? Yes.