data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c2d1/2c2d17b420f1f6f69e3cb0bf9fe41c6d6451ee3c" alt=""
ContentOne would be built from the vastly shrunken resources of the Pulitzer Prize-winning Gannett News Service, which had for decades provided Congressional and other national coverage for the company's U.S. newspapers and other sites. Dubow said of ContentOne's timetable that he expected "many aspects of it up and running in the first quarter."
But now, more than a year after Gannett Blog disclosed its existence, ContentOne hasn't maintained the high profile Dubow promised, raising questions about its role in Gannett's still cloudy future amid a rapidly changing digital landscape.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32651/3265154629aea57451651adda22ab63c22d8ce90" alt=""
To be sure, Gannett Chief Digital Officer Chris Saridakis may have been alluding to it when he told the same UBS conference: "In 2010, we will be embarking on a major redesign of our sites that will redefine what a local news site is and drive innovation for both our users and advertisers." He did not give a timetable, however. (Take note, webmasters!)
Asked about USA Today's ties to ContentOne in June, top editor John Hillkirk told Corporate's weekly newsletter, Newswatch: "We're meeting regularly with editors and directors in Gannett Broadcast, ContentOne and Community Publishing to discuss ways we can work together to cover everything from breaking news to the Swine flu scare. As with the Swine flu and March Madness, we'll be eager to share with all the properties our national coverage -- and we're eager to collaborate and share resources."
Meanwhile, Gannett News Service, which was to provide the initial reporting power, lost as much as 60% of its staff in buyouts and other cuts; it had just 16 staffers when it was formally disbanded and renamed ContentOne in mid-February 2009. (It's still the old GNS in name and responsibilities in Corporate's history of Gannett.)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf1c2/bf1c230cafc9581c98896b17305ab9caac1bf3bc" alt=""
But ContentOne's top job went to Gannett's chief spokeswoman, Tara Connell (below); that shift was completed in mid-summer, when Connell was replaced by new publicist Robin Pence. There were early reports ContentOne would be part of the public relations department, but it wasn't listed among Pence's duties when her hiring was announced in July. (Marymont, Connell and Pence are all vice presidents, indicating they each report straight up, rather than to each other. As publicist, Connell's boss was Chief Financial Officer Gracia Martore; does she now report to newspaper division President Bob Dickey?)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6ecc/c6eccd08978ffca2b94a86340ed7c41eff23135f" alt=""
Since March, I haven't heard of any major ContentOne developments. I was on hiatus from Gannett coverage from July to early December. Still, I kept an eye on major updates via the investor relations department and press releases distributed online.
So, I'm left wondering: What happened to the initiative that was designed to "upend the traditional thinking about content in our industry?"
Please post your replies in the comments section, below. To e-mail confidentially, write jimhopkins[at]gmail[dot-com]; see Tipsters Anonymous Policy in the rail, upper right.
Like every other initiative Gannett rolled out through the years like News2000, Real Life, Real News. Huge hype for a few months, then it just faded away.
ReplyDeleteP.S., Welcome back Jim!
The epitome of the state of this company run by untalented people in positions of power. Like everything else they "innovate", it's the Emperor's New Clothes- all BS and no substance.
ReplyDeleteI can tell you this about using ContentOne at our mid-size newspaper. I've accessed it to get content just one time since its launch. That may be more a result of our focus on local coverage than any reflection on what's offered by ContentOne.
ReplyDeleteP.S.: Welcome back, Jim!
During a recent site visit Marymont was asked by reporters to explain Content One. She seemed flustered by the question, and dodged it. Most of her emphasis was on staffing. She vaguely promised that some vacant positions would be filled "eventually" and she parroted the old "We must make do with the resources we have" line. Very disappointing. Our paths crossed at other sites a couple of times in the past, and she used to be better than that.
ReplyDeleteWhat I saw from the content one rollout was a backward slide. I expected a McClatchy-like content portal to be created to aggregate and centralize gannett-created content, at minimum. Instead no centralized site was ever created; few original photos were posted to the Gannett Photo Network (re-branded ContentOne); graphics from other papers were no longer posted to the Gannett Graphics Network website (which turned into an archive) and instead had to be retrieved via an FTP site. The only thing I saw was an e-mail ContentOne budget sent out regularly, and 'breaking' ContentOne advisories, usually sent out 30 minutes or so after the AP moved their advisory.
ReplyDeleteFrom my experience, it's much, much easier to cut out the middle man (ContentOne) and arrange content sharing directly with other Gannett papers.
ReplyDeleteI don't know about the rest of you, but I think Content One is not the answer. Living in Central Ohio, I don't really care to read about what is happening in Cincinnati. Too far away to be relevant.
ReplyDelete