Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Layoffs | To plan ahead, a Gannett Blog FAQ

Gannett Blog recorded 31,000 visits Dec. 3, the peak of the last big job reduction; click on graphic for bigger view. This fever line reflects the fact cuts occurred before and after the planned layoff date. The same could occur in one week -- if current speculation is true.

Here are some questions, and the best available answers, on a plan to cut newspaper division employment by about 1,400 jobs. It appeared earlier, before an announcement July 1, which may explain some inconsistencies with current circumstances.

Q. When are the rumored job cuts taking place?
A. July 8 -- one week from tomorrow.

Q. But what about the recent report about July 15?
A. That is when Gannett Co. announces second-quarter financial results, and discusses the outlook for the near term. It's likely Chief Financial Officer Gracia Martore will give Wall Street analysts updated figures on any layoffs that have occurred by then.

Q. Will everyone get notified on July 8?
A. Very unlikely. The December layoffs were to occur on Dec. 3. But they began several days before, and lasted several days after, because some publishers were out of town, and wanted to be on-site when workers got notified. The pattern resembled a bell curve, as the Gannett Blog traffic graphic, above, reflects.

Q. How should I prepare, just in case?
A. Slow down spending. Delay all major decisions. Start looking online for jobs. (That's what I did before leaving USA Today. It's a very sobering exercise.)

A. Got any more advice about preparing for the job market?
Start collecting copies of items (e-mail, work samples, for example) you'll want when you start job-hunting. Should you get called into an office to be notified, your computer access will likely be cut immediately, and you may not be able to return to your desk unescorted. Gannett Blog readers have suggested forwarding copies of critical e-mail to a personal e-mail account. I use Gmail. But Yahoo, MSN and other such free services work just as well.

Also, if you're a blogger, print copies of your best posts. I didn't do that, and found too late that USA Today had deep-sized my small-business blog. (Grrrrr!) If you're not a blogger, start now. Blogging is good for everyone, not just editorial, because it forces you into the online world. There are plenty of free blog publishing platforms. I use Google's Blogger. But there's Twitter, TypePad, WordPress and others. If you've got teen-agers nearby, ask for help.

Q. What about online job-hunting resources?
A. Join LinkedIn and Facebook. The latter isn't just for college students anymore. I use it daily.

Q. How about medical benefits?
A. This is going to be the biggest challenge of all. My impression from the December layoffs: Hewitt Associates was overwhelmed with requests. Calls went unanswered, or did not get returned for days. You will need to be merciless in keeping on this. And that was when Corporate was "only'' cutting 2,500 or so jobs. This time, the number could hit 4,500 or more. Consider asking a family member of friend to stay by the phone 24/7 if necessary.

Q. 4,500?!
A. That's just one estimate for U.S. Community Publishing, the domestic newspaper division, which employs somewhere around 30,000 of Gannett's global workforce of 41,500 at the end of 2008. (See, inset graphic, above.)

In fact, however, I suspect Corporate is aiming at a financial target. For example, say those 4,500 each cost an average $75,000 in wages, medical and other benefits. (Remember: some worksites, such as USA Today, The Arizona Republic and The Indianapolis Star, have legacy payrolls that are much more costly than, say, the smaller community papers.) Multiply that times 4,500 and you get a savings goal of $338 million.

Q. And pension/401(k) payouts?
A. Corporate will be equally challenged here. The second you learn you've been laid off, immediately complete the paperwork Gannett gives you during your notification meeting. Your retirement assets should be tapped only as a last resort -- say, to avoid foreclosure on your home, or to keep your children in school. Some employees complained that it took months to get their rollover checks.

Frankly, I'd like to know how the pension plan can afford to pay 4,500 lump-sum payouts to roll into IRAs or other company plans. Those must be in cash, I believe. (Anyone know the answer?)

Other questions? Better answers? Please post your replies in the comments section, below. To e-mail confidentially, write gannettblog[at]gmail[dot-com]; see Tipsters Anonymous Policy in the green rail, upper right.

[Graphic:
top, Google Analytics]; inset, Gannett's worldwide employment, with annual change, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Forms 10-K]

20 comments:

  1. I was just wondering today why HR didn't provide us with some helpful general advice in advance of July 8 -- you know, a "what to do if you get laid off" kind of guide. This post is practical and handy. Hopefully those of us in my newsroom won't need it, but it pays to be prepared. Thanks, Jim, for all you have done and continue to do in the face of tremendous obstacles. You're going out with a bang. Good luck to us all.

    ReplyDelete
  2. HR is not working for the employees - they're working for the upper echolon at Gannett. Haven't seen anything constructive coming out of HR since the beginning of layoffs, reduction of pay or any other inane attempt to save the "Titanic".

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks! Sadly, I can knock these from memory.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I work at the Indy Star and I don't make anywhere near 75K.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Honestly Jim,

    You have done some of your best work these last few days. I'm so glad the “old Jim” is back. I know you really took it hard after all the harassment and nasty comments, but you have proved yourself, once again, as a top notch journalist and blogger.

    Well done my friend.

    ReplyDelete
  6. A reminder to those who don't get laid off. Please try to keep in touch with those who do. I was laid off in December and was soon forgotten despite many years of service and what I thought were fairly good relationships with many coworkers. I could have used some support during my still-fruitless job search, but my former colleagues...well, let's just say I've had many disappointments and losses, but also some revelations about human nature. If you survive, don't just be happy for yourself. Remember those who were lost. In fact, if you knew someone from December's cuts, it might not be a bad idea to reach out and just say hello. I am sure they'd be happy to hear from you.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Jim, the fact we're getting this news about the latest round of layoffs so far in advance is a testament to your good work. I wish you weren't quitting. We're gonna need you.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Amen on that! A USA Today colleague who left mere weeks before me e-mailed this warning: "Get ready for the big chill."

    ReplyDelete
  9. Computer suggestion -- get a flash drive stick and copy to that any documents, photos, emails etc. that you might want in case of layoff.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Weird, isn't it. It's like one of my friends who was laid off said, “Maybe they think it is contagious“.

    Sad but true.

    I look at it this way. If they were truly your friends, they would still call or e-mail. If they weren't – screw 'em!

    Blogger Jim said...

    Amen on that! A USA Today colleague who left mere weeks before me e-mailed this warning: "Get ready for the big chill."

    ReplyDelete
  11. At least one large paper at the top of the alphabet will be a week later than July 8 for legal reasons.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I was a Dec. victim. Still no pension money, and that should give folks some pause.

    ReplyDelete
  13. More details, please: When did you start asking? Number of phone calls, letters, etc.!

    ReplyDelete
  14. The thing I'm reminded of in the last financial analyst quarterly call was that they were pushing for how Gannett was going to keep up the opex savings with furloughs. I think that while the "vacation excuse" given in the Broadcast memo has some validity, that it is also true that corporate recognized they needed to make these savings permenant to satisfy the financial analysts.

    I suppose the interesting thing is in Broadcast they went for a pay cut rather than further layoffs. That seems to be a recognition that Broadcast may have reached a point where there is nobody (not literally, but on a large scale) left to cut and still have the capability to make TV.

    Whether they go with an across the board pay cut or layoffs in publishing will probably depend on whether they feel they've gotten to that point with the newspapers yet or not.

    Personally, it does feel to me from the little I know that Gannett has gotten somewhat "chief heavy" due to cutting far more indians than chiefs the last year.

    ReplyDelete
  15. 7:14 a.m. says: Personally, it does feel to me from the little I know that Gannett has gotten somewhat "chief heavy" due to cutting far more indians than chiefs the last year.

    Here's the thing -- they can work those of us on salary to death and not have to worry about OT. My pay is higher than those I supervise, obviously, but I do a hell of a lot more work just to get it all done.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Does anyone know about any layoffs at The News-Press in Ft. Myers? Estimate number & dept affected?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Don't you mean that it's one week from tomorrow?

    Sloppy, as usual.

    ReplyDelete
  18. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  19. f it jim, post the reviews and prove the trolls wrong. black out the names of your editors. make 'em eat it.

    ReplyDelete
  20. No. I still care about my colleagues back at USAT. It would be unfair. (Besides: LOL. Do you think I hauled copies of my performance reviews with me to Spain?!)

    ReplyDelete

Jim says: "Proceed with caution; this is a free-for-all comment zone. I try to correct or clarify incorrect information. But I can't catch everything. Please keep your posts focused on Gannett and media-related subjects. Note that I occasionally review comments in advance, to reject inappropriate ones. And I ignore hostile posters, and recommend you do, too."

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.