Tuesday, January 13, 2009

Documents reveal Gannett strategy to protect Neuharth's lifetime pay from corporate failure

The $100,000 Gannett pays annually to lifetime consulting columnist Al Neuharth is just the tip of the iceberg better known as his 20-year-old retirement plan, newly uncovered public documents show.

The documents reveal that Neuharth and fellow board members took special steps in 1989 to shield the media mogul's retirement income in the then-unlikely event Gannett collapsed. He was board chairman at the time, having turned over the CEO's job to John Curley three years before.

In addition to the consulting fee, Gannett pays Neuharth $16,666 a month, about $200,000 a year, under a deferred compensation agreement, according to the 1989 proxy report to shareholders. The monthly payments appear to be in cash; the proxy does not mention company stock. (See document detail, below.)

Exit deals like Neuharth's are common across Corporate America. But they rarely surface so long after the fact. Moreover, details of his golden retirement package are emerging as Gannett newspaper workers brace for another round of payroll cuts. Beleagured investors, meanwhile, face more revenue losses when Gannett reports fourth-quarter earnings in perhaps two weeks.

Now 84 years old, Neuharth lives in Cocoa Beach, Fla., at his oceanfront Pumpkin Center estate. He is senior advisory chairman of the Freedom Forum, a journalism foundation he launched in 1991 with $650 million in Gannett shareholder capital. The charitable foundation in Washington, D.C., paid Neuharth $835,000 in fees and expenses in 2006-2007 alone, public IRS documents show.

The 1989 proxy says Gannett secured Neuharth's $16,666 payments by establishing an account with more than $5 million at Northern Trust Co. of Chicago. The figure might have been closer to $6 million; the proxy copy I obtained yesterday under federal open-records law is illegible in places.

The terms require Gannett's retirement plan administrators to use the assets solely to pay Neuharth. The only circumstances under which he wouldn't get paid are what ought to have been unthinkable in 1989: "General creditors of the company may reach the trust's assets if the company becomes bankrupt or insolvent,'' the document says.

Today, of course, anything is possible. Speculation is swirling that Gannett is about to reduce newspaper payroll again, after cutting nearly 2,200 jobs last month, on top of at least 1,100 positions in the third quarter. Advertising revenue is tumbling, and GCI's share price is down 76% from a year ago -- more than twice the loss in the widely watched S&P-500 stock index.

But what about $1 million a year?
At least one report says Gannett has been paying Neuharth much more: $1 million a year for the rest of his life under his retirement plan; that appeared in a Washington Post story on March 23, 1993. I can't find that figure in the 1989 proxy. But it could well be true: Neuharth's base pay was $1 million during his last year as chairman.

Moreover, executive compensation disclosure rules were much less rigorous in 1989. For example, the proxy says Neuharth's consulting contract also provides him with "benefits, facilities, services and perquisites appropriate to the services and activities he is performing for Gannett.'' But the proxy doesn't assign a dollar value to those benefits, which Gannett would almost certainly do today. Indeed, the 1989 proxy is just 22 pages long; by comparison, last year's ran 60 pages, and the compensation section alone took up 33.

Click on the following image for a much bigger view of the crucial 1989 proxy language on Neuharth's monthly income:


Please help my research!
I got the 1989 proxy only yesterday, so I've still got plenty to read. You could help by giving the document a once-over, too: Simply download a copy I'm now making available via The Teletype Room widget in the blue sidebar, lower right.

I am making copies available for free -- although I paid a document service $30.87 for copying and delivery. So, please consider making a $5 contribution to defray my costs. Donors of $25 or more supporting my Money Trail series include 13 Anonymous readers, plus Jack Potter and Hilary Funk.

Join them, and help an independent journalist trying to earn a buck. Any donation appreciated. Those who contribute $25 or more through PayPal may list their name as a sponsor, above. (Names will only be listed on written request, in the PayPal message field; please include a phone number for verification.)

Please use the "Donate" tool in the green sidebar, upper right. Or mail cash/checks payable to: Jim Hopkins, 584 Castro St. #823, San Francisco, Calif., 94114-2594.

8 comments:

  1. Some of the things that Al did with the Gannett Foundation/Freedom Forum are pretty execrable, but this...I'm just not sure. It's a fairly high and mighty package, but I suspect that even in its day it wasn't too far out of line for someone who enjoyed his level of success.

    And funding the payment the way he did -- well, that's just smart.

    Still, this has a parasitical feeling to it...it looks like Al developed a variety of ways to continue to drag money out of the company, decades after he left.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I wonder if he's a happy man.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Do the perks include work on his house using employees from FLORIDA TODAY?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sheesh, you got something against old Al?

    When do you get back to reporting about Gannett?

    ReplyDelete
  5. 4:31: If that's you, Doug, maybe Jim will report on your retirement contract/perks next.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I can't believe there's not some kind of requirement that says a company must report ALL money going out to ALL retirees, no matter what year they retired. That just seems like basic fiscal responsibility.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Last night I had a dream: Craig Dubow called Neuharth and said, "For every week you keep collecting the $, I'm going to fire a journalist and send his or her last evaluation to the board."

    Then I woke up.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Let Al have his money, he earned it, but for cripe's sake stop that fluff, "Pat myself on the back" column he writes in USA Today on Friday. Spare us from having to read that.... please.

    ReplyDelete

Jim says: "Proceed with caution; this is a free-for-all comment zone. I try to correct or clarify incorrect information. But I can't catch everything. Please keep your posts focused on Gannett and media-related subjects. Note that I occasionally review comments in advance, to reject inappropriate ones. And I ignore hostile posters, and recommend you do, too."

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.