Wednesday, December 24, 2008

Silence is rotten: What Gannett no longer reveals


[Bunker mentality: Growing silence from The 11th Floor]

Reflecting the industry's worsening slump, the New York Times Co. said today that revenue from continuing operations fell 14% last month from a year ago, on a 21% plunge in advertising sales.

NYT Co. disclosed the figures in its monthly revenue summary, a version of which Gannett published for more than eight years -- until October, when Chief Financial Officer Gracia Martore frustrated Wall Street by abandoning the practice.

Martore announced the change during the third-quarter earnings teleconference. Growing volatility in digital revenues made the reports less meaningful, she said. The final one, for August, showed publishing ad revenue had plunged a record 16.8% (chart, above).

Unhappy analyst: Why now?
Martore's decision fueled the impression Gannett was hiding information that it expected was about to get really bad, just as the company entered uncharted waters. Without monthly reports such as today's from NYT, Gannett's investors would be forced to wait three months -- until the quarterly earnings release -- to know what's happening inside the company.

Analysts were skeptical. "You guys don't stop printing a newspaper when the news is really bad,'' analyst Craig Huber of Barclays Capital told her at the time. "Why is this being stopped now?" Martore shot back: "You are making an assumption that we are stopping it because the news is bad, and that's not why we are stopping it temporarily."

In a comment, Anonymous@2:41 p.m. isn't surprised: "Silence from Gannett? Whooda thunk it?"

Hush-hush: Dubow gifts, layoffs
Martore's disclosure appears to be part of a broader, growing effort by the nation's top newspaper publisher to impose greater secrecy on operations at the very time investors and employees need more information:
  • For more than three weeks now, the company has refused to reveal how much money its charitable Gannett Foundation has diverted to CEO Craig Dubow's private scholarship fund at a little-known North Carolina University.
  • Gannett this month eliminated nearly 2,200 newspaper jobs without any formal acknowledgement -- no 8-K filing with securities regulators, nor even a simple press release. The real total is certainly higher. Indeed, official spokeswoman Tara Connell only acknowledged a layoff was planned after it was reported here; if anything, Connell tried to downplay the news.
  • Corporate last month abandoned the Daily News Summary -- highlights of internal and external news that had been delivered Monday through Friday to thousands of employees.
  • In September, Connell confirmed in an interview with Columbia Journalism Review that she had ended virtually all communication with this blog's more than 10,000 employees and other readers. That followed USA Today Publisher Craig Moon's plea for employees to stop airing dirty laundry here -- an advisory that was immediately ignored.
Please post your replies in the comments section, below. To e-mail confidentially, write gannettblog[at]gmail[dot-com]; see Tipsters Anonymous Policy in the green sidebar, upper right.

[Photo: Kohn Pedersen Fox Architects]

12 comments:

  1. What is remarkable about that New York Times report is that the ad climate worsened in November. It is quite clear it is bad, but how bad? Very bad, the NYT says. A little bit of honesty is needed from GCI here. The company is pouring money into an outrageous dividend, yet watching as the stock price declines. So they are not fooling Wall Street investors, who know what that NYT report means to GCI. So who do they think they are deceiving with this non-disclosure policy?

    ReplyDelete
  2. 12/24/2008 1:40 PM said

    "...who do they think they are deceiving with this non-disclosure policy?"

    I'd guess it's less about deception than it is about denial. All the half baked ideas that they have come up with that have led to further losses of revenue can only be seen as "potentials" by those who've overdosed on the KoolAid. These "brainchildren" innitiatives and products for sale: that bleed the efforts of the worker bees: fail. Time and time again. The blame is placed on those who are charged with planning, and layout, or sales of these dead horses. Not those who borne the ideas with no clue as to what value it has for the reader or advertiser.

    Denial...is only a river in Egypt in the minds of those who reside in the Offices of the Emerald City.

    ReplyDelete
  3. people like 1:40 have no clue how to run a business. Everyone is stupid but them. Come on pal, show us how smart you are and come up with one idea that will actually produce revenue. What's the problem cat got your tongue?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous said...
    people like 1:40 have no clue how to run a business. Everyone is stupid but them. Come on pal, show us how smart you are and come up with one idea that will actually produce revenue. What's the problem cat got your tongue?

    12/24/2008 5:06 PM

    And what would you offer up as innovative and revenue generating?

    Only a corner office boob or a well Cool Aid drunk would paint such a broad stroke without offering up a suggestion themself. Elitism at it's finest.

    Time to practice your preachings, and stop towing the Corporate line.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Heres a revenue generating idea.

    Report the news like you did in the 80's.

    Sell the subscriptions for the same prices you did in the 80's.

    Sell the ads for the same prices you did in the 80's.

    Deliver service and customer satisfaction like you did in the 80's.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Martore and Dubow are two really big asses. Why would they want to restrict any communication?

    Don't they see that half of their employees read this blog?

    Unfortunately, the digital medium, like this blog, has really caught them off guard.

    Jim, have you ever interviewed the Chief Digital officer and asked him his thoughts about this blog and the role that it plays? He seems like the only one on that executive team that would probably "get it".

    ReplyDelete
  7. Funny thing is, I would have never known about this blog if it wasn't for Dubow's famous "Stand down Gannett" email from last year! What CEO would send an email to 40K+ employees about a blog posting "bad things" about him/the company? Answer, a dumbass one.

    ReplyDelete
  8. 6:42 pm: Nope -- I've never interviewed Chief Digital Officer Chris Saridakis.

    ReplyDelete
  9. 6:40

    LOL. Does that mean you want to be paid like you were in the 80's?

    ReplyDelete
  10. 2:23 No, just wear the same clothes!

    ReplyDelete
  11. 9:52 AM: Do you still have that "stand down" memo? or does anyone? I don't remember it, but I would love to see it!

    ReplyDelete
  12. I'd like to see that memo, too.

    ReplyDelete

Jim says: "Proceed with caution; this is a free-for-all comment zone. I try to correct or clarify incorrect information. But I can't catch everything. Please keep your posts focused on Gannett and media-related subjects. Note that I occasionally review comments in advance, to reject inappropriate ones. And I ignore hostile posters, and recommend you do, too."

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.