Thursday, March 19, 2009

Director McCune's odd way of showing faith in GCI

One of Gannett's newest directors, Scott McCune, occupies the unofficial "Coca-Cola Co. seat,'' after directors elected him to the 10-member board last October.

Now, as he faces ratification by stockholders at next month's annual meeting, I hope McCune explains why he was the only director declining to be paid any of his $15,500 of director fees in Gannett stock last year -- his very first on the board (inset, fee table).

The appearance that he is shunning our stock from the git-go hardly instills confidence among investors he's supposed to serve, or among employees he's expected to lead. All the other board members sought shares, or a combination of cash and shares, the new proxy report to stockholders says. Yet: "Mr. McCune elected to receive his director compensation for 2008 in cash,'' the director pay section says.

Dubow ID'd McCune
A Coca-Cola marketing executive, McCune (left) was one of two directors elected Oct. 30; the other, Howard Elias, is a division chief at technology giant EMC Corp. McCune, 52, joined the board after Director Charles Fruit died last spring. Although McCune wasn't officially his replacement, Fruit also was in marketing at the Atlanta beverage goliath.

Indeed, Fruit was one of three directors who asked to be paid entirely in stock. The other two: Donna Shalala and Neal Shapiro. As the board's only employee-member, Chairman and CEO Craig Dubow isn't entitled to director fees.

Dubow recommended McCune to the committee responsible for finding new directors, the Nominating and Public Responsibility Committee, "as a prospective director with broad business experience and expertise in consumer marketing strategies,'' the proxy report says. "After each Nominating and Public Responsibility Committee member met with McCune and the committee as a whole reviewed his qualifications and experience in accordance with its charter mandate, the committee unanimously recommended that he be elected to our board of directors."

Footnote facts
The McCune detail would be easy to miss. I found it in footnote No. 8 of 12 to the directors' compensation table -- on page 51 of the 57-page report. That's why it pays to read all the way to the bitter end.

Please post your replies in the comments section, below. To e-mail confidentially, write gannettblog[at]gmail[dot-com]; see Tipsters Anonymous Policy in the green rail, upper right.

11 comments:

  1. This guy just might be the smart one on the board.

    Can the lot and keep him.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "That's why it pays to read all the way to the bitter end."

    And we thank you for it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Cash is King!

    I think he is smarter than the other idiots on this board.

    Jim,
    If you were on the board and you had a choice, cash payment or stock of a company being run by Dubow & Martore, what would you choose?

    Shit, I would take ruples, instead of GCI stock!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yeah, you got 'em now. There's only one possible answer - he wanted to be on the board but he doesn't think Gannett can grow. Yeah, that makes sense. Investigative blogging is where it's at.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I noticed Magner is on the board of directors for Millennium Promise, a group that shows CareerBuilder as a corporate partner.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It would be better if you actually made an effort to get McCune on the phone to get his explanation. Maybe there's another reason other than he has no faith in the company and its stock. I don't know that, but that's what they call -- ahem -- journalism.

    ReplyDelete
  7. An A.P. perspective on Dubow's pay in today's International Herald Tribune.

    http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2009/03/19/business/NA-US-Gannett-Executive-Compensation.php

    ReplyDelete
  8. Come on Jim. If he took the money, people would be complaining that the directors don't need the money and if they cared about the company they would give up the payment to help cut costs. Now he's doing something many see as fiscally responsible and you say he's showing a lack of faith in the company. Make up your mind...which is it? You seem to find a way to show all things Gannett in the worst light.

    ReplyDelete
  9. 10:09
    He TOOK the money.

    Go back and read thru Jim post

    ReplyDelete
  10. Way to go McCune. Your decision says it all.

    (Just keep in mind that the rest of us have to take our 401K match in Gannett stock.)

    So take your money and run.

    ReplyDelete
  11. 10:09

    Yes, it is a big deal because he was the ONLY one on the board to do it. If others had done it, it wouldn't be the story it is.

    8:09

    How do you know Jim has NOT tried to get his explanation?

    ReplyDelete

Jim says: "Proceed with caution; this is a free-for-all comment zone. I try to correct or clarify incorrect information. But I can't catch everything. Please keep your posts focused on Gannett and media-related subjects. Note that I occasionally review comments in advance, to reject inappropriate ones. And I ignore hostile posters, and recommend you do, too."

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.