USAT says the timeline of the activity "tracks the paper's reporting on the military's 'information operations' program, which spent hundreds of millions of dollars on marketing campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan — campaigns that have been criticized even within the Pentagon as ineffective and poorly monitored."
Friday, April 20, 2012
USAT| Reporter, editor targets of cyber campaign
USAT says the timeline of the activity "tracks the paper's reporting on the military's 'information operations' program, which spent hundreds of millions of dollars on marketing campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan — campaigns that have been criticized even within the Pentagon as ineffective and poorly monitored."
2 comments:
Jim says: "Proceed with caution; this is a free-for-all comment zone. I try to correct or clarify incorrect information. But I can't catch everything. Please keep your posts focused on Gannett and media-related subjects. Note that I occasionally review comments in advance, to reject inappropriate ones. And I ignore hostile posters, and recommend you do, too."
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
How is this a "cyber campaign"? It is dirty tricks, pure and simple.
ReplyDeleteThe Guardian in England has now reported on this Nixon-style hatchet job. Antiwar.com linked to The Guardian account this morning.
Let's start a cyber campaign to get rid of all the dead weight that's dragging the rest of the operation down.
ReplyDelete