An independent journal about the Gannett Co. and the news industry's digital transition
Three sentences in the Cramer item, and one of them is messed up.66 2/3 percent success rate, Jimbo. No wonder you are an unemployed DJ who begs for money.
There are two Jim Hopkinses in San Francisco. It's the other one who is a DJ.
That's too bad, Jim. You are even less cool than I thought.Fix that sentence yet?
There's something just pointless about going to a site just to complain about it.If something is truly terrible, you're best served by ignoring it. The hatred you have for the site and Jim suggests some other issue ...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
I appreciate the chuckle Jim. Need it working in this hellish place.
See what happens? You fire Michael Davidson and the whole blue chip program falls apart.
12:06 a.m., and you're paying how much to read Jim's work?Exactly.
Rudd Davis was working on boosting prison readership. nothing like a captive audience.
Jim says: "Proceed with caution; this is a free-for-all comment zone. I try to correct or clarify incorrect information. But I can't catch everything. Please keep your posts focused on Gannett and media-related subjects. Note that I occasionally review comments in advance, to reject inappropriate ones. And I ignore hostile posters, and recommend you do, too."
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
Subscribe in a reader