Thursday, April 29, 2010

Springfield | What are they smoking in Missouri?!

While researching a post about a controversial reader-submitted column in the Springfield News-Leader, I landed on that Gannett paper's website. Yikes! Talk about a poster child for why Gannett needs to hurry up Project Odyssey, the reported code name for the planned redesign of its community newspaper websites. Check out the screenshot, below, of the Missouri paper's homepage (click on image for bigger view):


Of that redesign, Anonymous@5:26 p.m. wrote in a recent comment:

The new website design is the mastermind of Chris Saridakis and Kevin Poortinga in Digital. Actually, our site (and many in U.S. Community Publishing) like the initial designs and thought process behind it. The internal code name is Project Odyssey.

It is in the early phases, but we will see parts of it rolling out by 3rd quarter with a bulk of it by the end of the year.

ContentOne has not been involved (Thank God!) with this project. This will certainly be better than GO4, but many of us are worried that with the exit of Saridakis, will his team be able to deliver on the initial vision for the redesign.

Got a website that beats the News-Leader's? Please post your replies in the comments section, below. To e-mail confidentially, write jimhopkins[at]gmail[dot-com]; see Tipsters Anonymous Policy in the rail, upper right.

4 comments:

  1. This is the same lockstep template most of us have to follow. No flexibility for special projects or packages, especially at papers without a real Web site manager on staff.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The only thing it's missing to separate from Wilmington is the floating pop-up ad and the video links. It's fugly as sin.

    Disagreeing with 2:13 - at least in Wilmington, we do blowout treatment for breaking news and big stories, pushing the three-story carousel down and bannering a story or photo across the top.

    ReplyDelete
  3. David Ledford has never been one to worry about Gannett rules overly much. And that is much to his credit.

    ReplyDelete
  4. A real problem is that every small paper is staffed with editors who spend time every day looking at the sites of larger papers trying to find things they can steal. Doesn't matter if its ugly, if it gets traffic you'll see it on 20 other sites in a week.

    ReplyDelete

Jim says: "Proceed with caution; this is a free-for-all comment zone. I try to correct or clarify incorrect information. But I can't catch everything. Please keep your posts focused on Gannett and media-related subjects. Note that I occasionally review comments in advance, to reject inappropriate ones. And I ignore hostile posters, and recommend you do, too."

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.