Tuesday, April 06, 2010

As pension assets fell, 24 advisers got $13.1 million

Come rain or shine, a slew of investment advisers, consultants, bookkeepers and law firms charge Gannett big bucks for helping run the company's pension plan. And in 2008 -- the most recent year available -- there was a lot of rain, newly released public documents show.

The value of the Gannett Retirement Plan's assets fell 34%, to $1.6 billion from $2.4 billion in 2007, as the overall stock market plunged amid the credit crisis, according to its latest annual report to the U.S. Labor Department. I obtained a copy yesterday under the federal Freedom of Information Act. Still, the plan's performance was better than the 41% decline in the broader market, as measured by the S&P 500 Index, according to Google Finance.

The plan benefited 55,423 participants in 2008, a number that has surely fallen since, after thousands of layoffs and other job cuts.

But it certainly benefited those advisers; they collected a combined $13.1 million in fees, the documents show. Here's the list:

Earlier: Documents reveal your Social Security numbers

[Image: that's a ticker tape machine]

3 comments:

  1. There are some interesting names on that list of advisers; I'll be writing more about them later.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The backstory on some of these companies:

    * Brandes Investment Partners is one of Gannett's biggest stockholders.
    * Nixon Peabody is a law firm that's done work for Gannett practically since the dawn of time.
    * Hewitt Associates manages customer service for Gannett's 401(k) plan (and gets roundly criticized on this blog for doing a poor job).
    * Ernst & Young is a huge accounting firm that audits the pension plan's books, plus those of Gannett itself.
    * The oddly named Excelleratehro does bookkeeping; it's a subsidiary of computer giant Hewlett-Packard.
    * Kushner Chupack is an accounting firm whose work on the plan is described simply as "admin," according to the report.

    ReplyDelete
  3. All that advising money spent, and I believe this was one of the years the company contibuted nothing to the pension accounts, other than the collectivley bargained ones and the ones in the UK.

    ReplyDelete

Jim says: "Proceed with caution; this is a free-for-all comment zone. I try to correct or clarify incorrect information. But I can't catch everything. Please keep your posts focused on Gannett and media-related subjects. Note that I occasionally review comments in advance, to reject inappropriate ones. And I ignore hostile posters, and recommend you do, too."

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.