The suit filed by David Johnson is still active, and depositions have been scheduled, Johnson's attorney told me this morning.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d47ec/d47eca93105fa3597bb81031e0def49bf733dff5" alt=""
During peak sports season in the fall, it was not unusual for the reporters to work seven days a week, exceeding 40 hours, the complaint says.
The Advertiser hired Johnson as assistant sports editor in May 2006, then promoted him to sports editor in April 2007, at an annual salary of $52,000, plus benefits, the suit says.
Starting in June 2007, the suit says, Johnson told his reporters to "document every hour they worked and list the time on their time cards.'' In the fall of 2008, management again told him that the reporters "would no longer be compensated for overtime hours, but were expected to cover the same amount of events as they had in the past."
Johnson continued to complain to Lloyd, Gray and Browder about their refusal to pay overtime, the suit says. Johnson says he also complained to the publisher at the time, Scott Brown. Johnson was eventually placed on probation for 90 days. Then, in November 2008, Johnson was fired, the suit says.
He is seeking back pay with interest, plus unspecified compensation for damages.
Got a tip about unpaid overtime? Please post your replies in the comments section, below. To e-mail confidentially, write jimhopkins[at]gmail[dot-com]; see Tipsters Anonymous Policy in the rail, upper right.
[Image: today's Advertiser, Newseum]
I sure admire him for doing this.
ReplyDeleteThis is your life with Gannett. If you feel you are owed something, truely, like overtime, you have to fight tooth-and-nail to get it, placing your job on the line. You want to sue Gannett? Oh, by-the-way, you're FIRED! Gannett doesn't subsidize law suits. GOD, I truely hate this company!
ReplyDeleteI don't think I have ever heard anyone say that they enjoy their job at Gannett. Why anyone would choose to work there is beyond me.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous@2:51 p.m. today posted a comment about Johnson's lawsuit; I've edited out a portion that isn't supported by facts. The rest of 2:51 p.m.'s comment: "His allegations here are on the money."
ReplyDelete