Saturday, May 09, 2009

Money trail | A 'glam' night, but at what price?

[Condoleezza Rice with scholarship recipients last year]

The White House Correspondents' Association, which holds its glossy annual charity dinner tonight, has come a long way since Feb. 24, 1914, when it was founded to help President Woodrow Wilson organize a then-unprecedented series of press conferences. There was the 1944 dinner, which featured the most complete turnout of the nation's war leaders since Pearl Harbor; the menu featured unrationed duck, and off-the-record political wisecracks.

"Until 1962," the non-profit group's website says, "the dinner was open only to men even though the membership included women. That changed when, at the prodding of Helen Thomas of UPI (left), President John F. Kennedy said he would not attend the dinner unless the ban on women was dropped."

The WHCA now seeks to "mentor future generations of journalists, primarily through scholarships made possible by proceeds from the annual dinner,'' the professional association's website says. "It is for this that we host the annual White House Correspondents' Association dinner, which draws luminaries from politics, business, media, Hollywood and elsewhere to help the White House press corps raise money to give crucial financial assistance to journalism students at several institutions across the country."

Big parties, bigger layoffs
Gannett is joining major media in a multimillion-dollar industry extravaganza of pre-parties and post-parties this weekend. For the second consecutive year, however, The New York Times won't attend, saying the event is too focused on currying favor with big shots and gives a bad impression of the media cozying up to administration insiders, U.S. News and World Report said.

The black-tie dinner will draw 2,700 guests to the Washington Hilton, with all the usual Red Carpet accouterments. Adding to the Academy Awards feel: C-SPAN is promising a live Internet feed. "Watch the 2009 dinner arrivals, speeches, and awards presentations online." (Are Joan Rivers & Co. attending?)

With the flair of Vanity Fair, the Politico is covering the social swirl on its Dinner Dish blog, promising to take readers "inside Washington's most glamorous weekend."

Comedian Wanda Sykes (left) is emcee, an edgy-but-safe choice after Comedy Central's faux newsman, Stephen Colbert, scared the bejesus out of organizers three years ago. Tonight's fete also comes as thousands of journalists in and out of Gannett are losing their jobs to layoffs, or taking wage cuts and furloughs. (Yes.)

Searching for tax returns
To meet the demands of a 24/7 news cycle, the WHCA says, "many of our members are now involved in blogging in and other contemporary journalistic enterprises that have transformed traditional print and television news coverage in the 21st century."

I just wish that extended to posting its annual Form 990 report to the IRS, so we could learn more about what happens to the group's proceeds. The most recent report I could find is for the WHCA's fiscal tax year of 2006, covering Nov. 1, 2006, through Oct 31, 2007; it's at GuideStar, the firm that maintains a searchable database of thousands of Forms 990. (I pay a $100 monthly fee for access; GuideStar is where I got many of the documents I used in researching the Gannett Foundation and Freedom Forum.)

To be fair, I rarely find non-profits posting IRS reports online; they refer journalists and others to GuideStar and other third parties. Federal law says they must make available for public inspection the three most recent reports during regular business hours. But that doesn't work when you're on deadline, 2,817 miles away.

The bottom line: $33K
The WHCA is like a lot of non-profits: It holds a big annual dinner where members get to do good while having a good time. Problem is, for all the money coming in, not much flows to the bottom line: those scholarships to needy students.

The group's fiscal 2006 return shows it spent a grand total of $33,000 on scholarships. The dinner itself was single-biggest source ($293,888) of the group's total $582,803 in annual receipts for the period. But the event cost organizers $348,535 to mount, so the WHCA actually lost $54,647 on it (detail, below).

The group apparently spent even less on scholarships during its 2007 tax year; the website says: "The White House Correspondents' Association is going from donating $26,000 last year in scholarships to $132,000."

[Form 990 detail; click image for bigger view]


Crowdsourcing time!
Download the WHCA's fiscal 2006 Form 990 right here, for free, and see what you can find. Just go to The Teletype Room widget near the bottom of the blue rail, right, and follow the easy instructions.

Please post your replies
in the comments section, below. To e-mail confidentially, write gannettblog[at]gmail[dot-com]; see Tipsters Anonymous Policy in the green rail, upper right.

[Photo of Rice and students: Neshan H. Naltchayan, WHCA]

21 comments:

  1. Why don't you start a White House Correspondents' Association blog? This is the Gannett blog. Or shoulf Gannett be guilty by association to something perfectly legal?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Why post this blog twice? Are you wallpapering your own blog with your own news previously reported - again?

    ReplyDelete
  3. My mistake. It is on here THREE times.

    ReplyDelete
  4. 9:48 am: Sorry about extra copies; my Blogger software experienced a hiccup.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Well this helps explains were our raises went,along with many other wasteful spending

    ReplyDelete
  6. Garbage in, garbage out. If this had been a Gannett mistake there would have been some malicious intent behind the error.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Answer is simple: act poor, be poor. Never do good for anyone. Just be miserable.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Apparently, Craig Dubow and Craig Moon snadwiched Jenny McCarthy at last years WHCA Dinner. There was a picture floating around of a picture of Dubow and McCarthy sitting together.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This has to be the most outrageous waste of money corporate has embraced. While furloughs have forced staffers at GCI papers to reduce food fed their their chidren, USAT bigwigs are filling up their expense accounts escorting the famous and favored through Washington's extravagantly expensive restaurants. There are two Chinese restaurants here that charge $15 for an eggroll, and Washington has become a city of $50 shrimp cocktails and $100 deserts. It wouldn't be so bad if there was some return in USAT exclusives, but where are they? Who got the White House dog story first? Watch and see who gets the new Supreme Court nominee first (my bet is the NYT, which is boycotting this event). It's also sexist because USAT reporters actually get to charge the costs of their rental tuxedos, while rentals are shunned by the females and so come out of their pockets. So while you are eating hot dogs for Sunday supper, think of these poor USATers who have had to spend the entire weekend pushing back from tables after spending thousands of dollars feting themselves. URP. You paid for it.

    ReplyDelete
  10. 2:23 pm: Whew! I was beginning to fear no one would get the point:

    This. Is. Not. Shared. Sacrifice.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Richard Michem5/09/2009 2:33 PM

    WASHINGTON HILTON, interesting things going on their with Gannett's funds, having nothing to do with dinners. Speaking of dinners, Jim go to c-spam and look at the copy of a birthday,dinner they had for Al, a few years ago.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I might go along with a once-a-year show-the-flag expenditure and one $2000 table seating 12, with story sources invited. (BTW, I believe they are sit-12 tables). But why eight tables? Why the pre-and-post event rooms with drinks and finger food? Why the rehershal dinners the evening before the event? These are not weddings.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Richard Michem! One of Gannett Blog's longest-serving readers! You've definitely earned an Official Gannett Blob Power Cap! Send me a shipping address -- BY E-MAIL, of course!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Richard Michem5/09/2009 3:55 PM

    Thanks, but no thanks, for the hat. I hate wearing hats. Since hair is going the same way as the Gannett's profits. I lets hair see light and air as long as possible.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I think the company should only pay its people and never, ever do anything which might be good for the community, good for the industry, good for charity. Why? Just pay the damn employees what they want and go out of business.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I thought Moon's retirement put an end to this sort of extravagance at USA TODAY. We are hearing they are still planning more layoffs at our place, and yet it seems always business as usual at this corporate whore.

    ReplyDelete
  17. He may have been "extravagant" for business sake -- at least Moon know what he was doing and was SMART. Look at the Dumbo yes-man USA Today got handed with Hunky (who isn't).

    ReplyDelete
  18. OK, Richard; but the offer is always there. Keep coming back; it works, if you work it!

    ReplyDelete
  19. I saw few USAT reporters at any of these tables via C-Span. But don't blame Hillkirk. Who actually made the call on who went? Anyone want to detail how many reporters filled all the tables? Aren't they the ones who stand to gain from any purported sourcing/networking that would go on here?

    ReplyDelete
  20. Jim,

    Why are you bragging about paying $100 a month to Guidestar when the Foundation Center has 990s that you can access for free?

    I do agree that this dinner is a giant waste of coin. I can see having some reporters hobnob, but paying C-list losers to "grace" a table? Fuck that.

    ReplyDelete

Jim says: "Proceed with caution; this is a free-for-all comment zone. I try to correct or clarify incorrect information. But I can't catch everything. Please keep your posts focused on Gannett and media-related subjects. Note that I occasionally review comments in advance, to reject inappropriate ones. And I ignore hostile posters, and recommend you do, too."

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.