[Message image, but with actual e-mail addresses cropped out]
I have just e-mailed seven board members about my new post on possible 2008 bonuses for CEO Craig Dubow and other top executives.
An independent journal about the Gannett Co. and the news industry's digital transition
Jim says: "Proceed with caution; this is a free-for-all comment zone. I try to correct or clarify incorrect information. But I can't catch everything. Please keep your posts focused on Gannett and media-related subjects. Note that I occasionally review comments in advance, to reject inappropriate ones. And I ignore hostile posters, and recommend you do, too."
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
Jim; I don't see actual addresses for any of these clowns. Do you have them?
ReplyDelete6:46 pm: Yes.
ReplyDeleteGlad to see you added corporate secretary Todd Mayman to the list.
ReplyDelete6:52 pm: I would have included investor relations director Jeffrey Heinz, but I don't have his e-mail address.
ReplyDeletelstcyr@gannett.com
ReplyDeleteLarry St. Cyr to the rescue!!!
I've successfully written Director Karen Hastie Williams before. But the following reply suggests she may now be blocking my mail: "Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain"
ReplyDeleteJim,
ReplyDeleteAssuming Karen's email domain isn't owned by her, it's unlikely that error message means that she is blocking your email specifically. If she were actively blocking your messages, you wouldn't get an error back - your email would simply disappear.
Gannett blocks millions of SPAM messages per day and no error message is ever sent back to the sender. The messages simply go into the "bit bucket"
I wouldn't read anything into that error
Signed,
A former IT person with knowledge of the subject.
10:11 pm: D'oh! Thanks!
ReplyDeleteGood for you. Keep their feet to the fire.
ReplyDelete