Friday, January 09, 2009

Would this Hearst save San Francisco's newspaper?

He is a grandson of the legendary newspaper mogul. Yet, William Randolph Hearst III, 59 (left), is a partner in the Silicon Valley investment firm that backed a late-1990s start-up, Google -- now one of the industry's biggest threats. The money-losing paper is The San Francisco Chronicle, which his family-controlled Hearst Corp. bought eight years ago, just as the technology bubble popped, and the industry tumbled into a rapid decline.

Hearst Corp. has lost more than $330 million in San Francisco, no end in sight, despite multiple rounds of cost cuts. Northern California papers got hit early and hard by Google, plus Craigslist and other local start-ups. Smack in the middle: long-time Gannett executive Frank Vega, Chronicle publisher since 2005, and his top editor for the past year, another GCI lifer, Ward Bushee.

Now, with today's news that Hearst is suddenly abandoning the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, a big shake-up in its top executive ranks last June may be playing out across the New York-based media giant's newspaper division -- and possibly right up to the Chronicle's Mission Street front door here in San Francisco.

Last month, Hearst's newspaper division president, George Irish, announced his retirement. That followed the sudden departure in June of Hearst Corp. CEO Victor Ganzi. (Replacing Ganzi: former CEO Frank Bennack.) Published reports said Ganzi clashed with Hearst family members -- including Hearst III.

Since 1995, Hearst has been a partner at Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers. The venture-capital firm is an hour south of San Francisco in Silicon Valley's Millionaire Mile -- Sand Hill Road in Menlo Park, where he would be immersed in tech start-ups paving the way for whatever replaces the traditional newspaper industry.

Same city, different paper
The Hearst family's wealth is rooted in San Francisco newspapering and the West. But that doesn't mean Hearst III necessarily has any sentimental attachment to the traditional printed version. For one thing, it was a different paper, the San Francisco Examiner, that his famous grandfather (left) leveraged to build the first modern media empire in the 1890s -- and his palatial Hearst Castle, along California's central coast, at San Simeon.

By 2000, however, the Examiner was the smaller partner in a joint operating agreement, where the stronger, morning Chronicle was owned by descendants of the local de Young family. Hearst Corp. decided to sell the Examiner and buy the Chronicle, in a three-way deal that required Sen. Dianne Feinstein's intervention.

Hearst chose perhaps the worst possible year, 2000, to buy the Chronicle: It paid $660 million that July, which seems astonishing today, after eight years of the industry's rapid decline. (How much did Hearst overpay? That price is nearly a third of Gannett's current total market capitalization, $1.96 billion -- including USA Today! -- based on this afternoon's closing stock price, $8.59 a share.)

The deep recession that began more than a year ago only added to Hearst losses here that have averaged nearly $800,000 a week since mid-2000. I'm left with two broad questions:
  • Will Hearst cut its newspaper losses further, and make the Chronicle web-only, with a much smaller staff -- as it's apparently considering in Seattle?
  • And what role might Hearst III play?
Vega in the house
To be sure, going fully digital now would seem crazy: The Chronicle is scheduled to outsource printing this year to a new production plant being built by Transcontinental Inc. The company, Canada's biggest printer, will own the presses under a 15-year contract Hearst signed two years ago.

Even so, I've wondered whether San Francisco would be the first major U.S. city to go web-only. And maybe it still will: The Gannett-controlled Detroit Media Partnership took only a partial step in that direction last month, saying it would end home delivery on all but three days of the week, probably starting this spring. Chronicle publisher Vega (left) knows Detroit well. He was CEO of the Detroit JOA before the current occupant: Dave Hunke.

Vega surprised Gannett a year ago by luring away Bushee, who was then top editor at The Arizona Republic. Vega and Bushee have been tinkering on the paper ever since -- with plenty of help from old Gannett acquaintances. (Wink!)

Please post your replies in the comments section, below. E-mail confidentially via gannettblog[at]gmail[dot-com]; see Tipsters Anonymous Policy in the green sidebar, upper right.

[Images: today's front pages, Newseum]

11 comments:

  1. I would like you to process a citizens-delete request on this entire post, as this is not about Gannett (and we all know how hinky you are about non-Gannett posts).

    Plus, my verification word for this comment is "ousta". Must be a sign.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I disagree. Vega and Bushee (well at least Bushee) have several friends and admirers still in Gannett and they are very interested in what is going on if not with their newspaper at least with them. This is as relevant as the Freedom Forum posts that also have nothing to do with Gannett but are still of interest.

    ReplyDelete
  3. A not-so-well-kept secret in Washington is that Hearst is closing its Washington bureau, too.
    But as for SF, note that in announcing the Seattle shut-down, the Hearst exec indicated the PI could continue as a Web-only product, or delivered over a Kindle-like machine Hearst has been secretly working on for the last decade in Palo Alto. It strikes me that Corporate would now be very interested in such a home delivery product, since it promises to provide the huge sort of savings GCI needs.
    That $6 billion debt wasn't much of a problem last year, but betcha it is looming very large on the screens of the Crystal Palace this year as the revenues needed to pay it off are dangerously dwindling. And look at the big savings to be made doing away with all that expensive backroom operations with their clunky old-fashioned machinery. Hmmm...wondering if GCI has made an overture to Hearst for a helping hand. Beats the alternataive, which is to follow the Christian Science-Seattle PI model and go Web only, which I believe is seriously considered in the towers these days.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hearst's Seattle decision is absolutely astonishing. The Seattle Times, partner with the PI in a joint operating agreement, is on the ropes because the Times owner (the Blethen family) got deep into dept in a mistaken venture buying papers in Maine. It is only a matter of time before the Seattle Times is forced into bankruptcy, but now it looks like it will win the newspaper war as well.
    Similar to the situation in Denver, where Scripps is capitulating to the debt-laden Billy Dean Singleton's Denver Post.
    Lesson here: load down on debt is a winning strategy in the newspaper business today.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hearst is going to outsource printing for the SF Chronicle, which is why those new presses are being built.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Here is the latest from our fearless leader in Detroit. Now why doesn't it surprise me? I am not complaining mind you, I am paid well for my way over "full-time" - as long as I don[t break it down to the hourly rate anyway! But when merit increases have been far less than Cost of Living factor for several yrs - it is ashame we have to keep doing more with less.

    "We will not be awarding merit pay increases for non-bargaining employees for the 2009 calendar year. It is important for you to know this includes the entire executive committee and me.

    We know that everyone is working hard and that you all want the company to succeed. We are hopeful that the launch of our new strategic plan will allow us to reinstate merit increases in the future.

    Thank you for your continued support and understanding.

    David L. Hunke
    Publisher, Detroit Free Press
    CEO, Detroit Media Partnership

    ReplyDelete
  7. Dearest Dave Hunke,

    When you pull down 6 digits in salary and the first is over 1, not getting a pay increase matters far less than for others.

    Sincerely,
    Someone who buys milk and gas according to how much is available...

    ReplyDelete
  8. I agree with 7:30. What does this have to do with Gannett. In fact, the Freedom Forum is a different company, regardless where its money came from. I could care less how FF gives away money; I do care about how the Gannett Foundation does this.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Freedom Forum has been a money train for former Gannett execs and fellow travelers since its inception. Its operation is part of a culture of corruption, and as such is quite relevant to this blog's mission.

    If you don't like the posts on the FF, skip them.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Jimmy boy said, on 1/9: I just removed a comment about politics that did not bear directly on Gannett Co.

    We have seen this again and again. Not about Gannett, and it gets axed. Unless Jimmy wants to wax on about it. THEN it is OK.

    This is the same guy, Jimmy-boy, who continually whacks GCI management for not following its own directives. Ethics being one.

    Am I the only one who notices the hypocrisy here?

    ReplyDelete
  11. 1:01 AM
    Yes. You probably are the only one!

    ReplyDelete

Jim says: "Proceed with caution; this is a free-for-all comment zone. I try to correct or clarify incorrect information. But I can't catch everything. Please keep your posts focused on Gannett and media-related subjects. Note that I occasionally review comments in advance, to reject inappropriate ones. And I ignore hostile posters, and recommend you do, too."

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.