So, you can imagine my interest in a company document just sent to me, showing that traffic actually rose a fraction across the papers, two months after the new design roll out was mostly completed.
Now, the data covers just one month -- July. I wish it were more current. Still, it offers a revealing snapshot of how the community newspaper division's websites performed after the new template's high-profile roll out.
- USA Today: Page views rose 10.1%, to 196.2 million, from 178.2 million
- Broadcasting division: Page views fell 0.2% to 119.3 million, from 119.6 million
Several papers didn't make the switch until May, so their readers were still pissed off by July -- when this data was gathered; readers' initial reaction to any change is usually negative. Plus, there's simply more competition for readers today than there was in July 2007. For the community papers to stay even is itself an accomplishment, no?
Please post your replies in the comments section, below. To e-mail confidentially, write gannettblog[at]gmail[dot-com]; see Tipsters Anonymous Policy in the green sidebar, upper right.
[Image: today's Reno Gazette-Journal front page, Newseum. It's one of the 84 dailies in the community newspaper division]
USA Today numbers are impressive. Frankly.
ReplyDeleteIs anyone reporting figures for non-US news organizations that post world, including right here in the good old USA, news?
ReplyDeleteJim:
ReplyDeleteDoes the report mention "Unique visitor" numbers which are the real measure of a site's success?
I report online traffic for a few newspapers. The new design slowed the growth down but we did not drop in MUV or PV. IN fact the time spend on the site per visit sky rocketed.
ReplyDeleteSo the new design took some getting used to but does make the whole online interactive experience better.
Readers -- online or print -- don't like change. Once they get used to the change, they usually forget about what came before. So I'm not surprised by the strong numbers, either.
ReplyDeleteUSAT's numbers are not impressive. Look at the numbers for its competitors and you'll see it is growing much more slowly than all but one or two. The Washington Post has passed it on a month-by-month basis and it's now the No.3 newspaper-based website. It also does poorly in 'stickiness' -- the amount of time people spend on the site -- although it is doing better than it used to do. It is losing ground in this marketplace.
ReplyDeleteJim, can you provide a newspaper-by-newspaper break out of the numbers?
ReplyDeleteThere was a time perhaps 5-6 years ago when USA Today's total page views only slightly lagged the combined traffic (measured in page views) of all the community papers.
ReplyDeleteNow Gannett has has fewer community papers, but the page views seem to have blown far past USA Today.
Time spend can be a deceiving stat if a site is so poorly designed that visitors waste precious minutes looking for news items that are poorly labeled or organized.
ReplyDeleteUsat numbers could be even better, but things are positive and should get even better as the considerable energy at the site beguns to bloom.
ReplyDeleteThe Wash. Post surge is likely politics-oriented and once the campaign is over, should return to normal.
Usat's website is a positive still.
11:28 AM said: "Time spend can be a deceiving stat if a site is so poorly designed that visitors waste precious minutes looking for news items that are poorly labeled or organized."
ReplyDeleteMy theory about GO4: That's half the point. Give so many options that it's hard to find stuff, so users need to surf more to find the same amount of info.
Maybe I'm just a conspiracy nut.
If a site is hard to use; i.e., it takes longer to find stuff -- people will eventually give up and go elsewhere for their information. If that's NOT the case with USAT and other Gannett sites, it means readers quickly get used to the new interface and are sticking around because the sites have material they want to see.
ReplyDelete11:03 am: The data is in a spreadsheet that I can't easily post. Also, the person who supplied me the spreadsheet asked that I not forward it. Sorry.
ReplyDelete9:38 a.m. Yes, the document DOES list unique visitors.
ReplyDelete