Friday, July 18, 2008

CJR columnist: Gannett needs to cut its dividend

What could the newspaper business do with a spare $311 million? That’s how much Gannett paid out last year in dividends -- and about how much it will this year, Columbia Journalism Review columnist Ryan Chittum writes today.

GCI is Chittum's featured example in a piece about the insanity of newspaper publishers refashioning themselves into technology companies -- while simultaneously paying crazy-high dividends. (Gannett's yield climbed to 9.5% today, after the stock closed at $16.87, down 2.3%.)

News Corp. CEO Rupert Murdoch (left) said of Dow Jones & Co. before buying the Wall Street Journal publisher last year: "A year ago, they made $81 million after tax and paid $80 million in dividends, and you can’t grow a company that way."

GCI's top brass ought to listen to Murdoch. After all, he had the smarts to bet nearly $600 million on social network MySpace -- an investment now worth billions. (GCI's notion of an edgy bet was to invest a reported $8 million in social-network Cozi.) Craig Dubow needs to grow a pair: Take that $311 million and start acting like a real entrepreneur -- instead of a Wall Street lapdog.

Earlier: GCI's Connell says no dividend cut in the works, but . . .

How could Gannett put $311 million to better use? Please post your thoughts in the comments section, below. To e-mail confidentially, write gannettblog[at]gmail[dot-com]; see Tipsters Anonymous Policy in the green sidebar, upper right.

2 comments:

  1. I don't think Gannett needs to buy more companies. I am constantly asking myself, however, why Gannett is so gung-ho with third-party vendors (Maven, for example) when it certainly has the resources and the talent within its own web department to do it better -- cheaper.

    ReplyDelete
  2. If it is done in house, it will ultimately cost more. That's why outsourcing works. I can't imagine why the company continues to keep things in house when it should be slicing off the excess and getting work done elsewhere.

    ReplyDelete

Jim says: "Proceed with caution; this is a free-for-all comment zone. I try to correct or clarify incorrect information. But I can't catch everything. Please keep your posts focused on Gannett and media-related subjects. Note that I occasionally review comments in advance, to reject inappropriate ones. And I ignore hostile posters, and recommend you do, too."

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.