A former East Coast news staffer writes today: "I have been wanting to post more comments on your blog, but feel guilty about anonymous criticism, even though I am now officially 'retired' from Gannett. I guess it is the old-fashioned editor in me that bristles at anonymous criticism, especially of individuals, but I know that it is essential for current, active employees to retain their anonymity in making blog comments. I should have more guts and just use my name in posting on your blog, but frankly I don't trust Gannett, and fear retaliation in some form even though that is unlikely."The writer's note follows one of my better-read posts, on the corporate version of Stockholm syndrome: A former newspaper operating committee member feared contacting me, even after GCI could no longer punish her.
Join the debate, in the original post.
A well-founded and legitimate fear even for one who is retired.
ReplyDeleteHaving left Gannett after two decades of employment, it has been near impossible to re-connect with any of the major companies. Each one of them has a short-list, a preferred list, and a black-list.
Gannett is the most unforgiving company, especially if you are a well-known person among the executive staff.
Once you are done with drinking the Kool-Aid, done kissing ass, say "no" too often, and challenge their thinking...and too independent...you are dog meat.
I would never, never, ever reveal my identity. You will get soiled.
And no path back. Even if you wanted one.
It is called discrimination. It exists. Even if you can't prove it.