It's covering anything to do with the boss. I had the thankless job of editing stories about The Arkansas Gazette's circulation reports when the Little Rock paper was in a fierce newspaper war 20 years ago. (USA Today Publisher Craig Moon was the Gazette's publisher at the time; he held the job about two years before Gannett closed the paper in October 1991, amid annual losses as high as $30 million.)
At USA Today, I wrote about high turnover on the board of directors of telecom giant Global Crossing, after its spectacular collapse into bankruptcy, in 2002. Doug McCorkindale, Gannett CEO when I wrote the story, had been one of Global's directors, so I asked him for a comment. He would not return my calls. (It wasn't just me; McCorky wouldn't talk to any journalists about the subject). Ultimately, it took the intervention of top USA Today editors to get him to confirm what I knew to be true. (Department of Hmmmm: Curiously, I can't find the story anywhere on USA Today's website. There is this one, however.)
With that as background, I can only imagine the number of USA Today editors who sweated over the following paragraph in this morning's story about the pricey and controversial Newseum, opening in a week: "The Newseum, developed and funded by the independent and non-partisan Freedom Forum, has a number of ties to USA Today, including a common founder, Al Neuharth. Newseum president Peter Prichard, Newseum executive director Joe Urschel, USA Today Editor Ken Paulson and a number of Newseum executives have worked for both organizations."
Could editors have had any of this in mind?
[Image: this morning's USA Today, Newseum]
Friday, April 04, 2008
2 comments:
Jim says: "Proceed with caution; this is a free-for-all comment zone. I try to correct or clarify incorrect information. But I can't catch everything. Please keep your posts focused on Gannett and media-related subjects. Note that I occasionally review comments in advance, to reject inappropriate ones. And I ignore hostile posters, and recommend you do, too."
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I might have read the story today if it wasn't 45" long. I mean, really. 20" would have been more than enough.
ReplyDelete"... has A NUMBER of ties to USA TODAY"? A NUMBER? Sheesh ...
ReplyDeletejust guessing here that the NUMBER is someplace upwards of dozens, if not scores ...
When I was at The Nation's Nicepaper, we used to refer to the "Feed'em Forum" (legendary for its regular combinations of pompous-conferences-and-events-and-food-food-FOOD) and its Newseum as constituting something of a Full Employment Program for Former USA TODAY and Gannett Executives, Staffers, Pals, Etc.
All courtesy of Big Al & The Gang's virtual hijacking of the old Gannett Foundation and its rich assets. A nice, parting up-yours to the scores of Gannett towns and their charities that had come to rely on the old foundation's contributions to their hometown causes ...