data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1446/e14460f05a113f45d142b690f4cdf5de930b5108" alt=""
[Image: this morning's USA Today, Newseum]
An independent journal about the Gannett Co. and the news industry's digital transition
Jim says: "Proceed with caution; this is a free-for-all comment zone. I try to correct or clarify incorrect information. But I can't catch everything. Please keep your posts focused on Gannett and media-related subjects. Note that I occasionally review comments in advance, to reject inappropriate ones. And I ignore hostile posters, and recommend you do, too."
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
I like Murdoch. He gets stuff done. He's doesn't just talk, he makes things happen. Consumers HATE, LOATHE, DETEST, and DESPISE jump pages. We design and layout newspapers the way 'we' want to them to be - not the way consumers want them. We still do it because some editor says - "Well that's the way we've always done it." And another thing - Why can't we print page of the newspaper in color? USA TODAY should have figured this out years ago. The technology is there to do it, right? Will companies invest the resources to make it happen? I bet Murdoch would. Working with people in the newspaper industry reminds me of the recent IBM commercials where everyone's "talking" about innovation...and IBM says, "Start Doing!" I would not be surprised if WSJ circ matches and passes NYT and USATODAY within 3 years.
ReplyDeleteThis is so wrong in so many ways. All news for NY will be coming from right wing neo con newspapers?
ReplyDeleteSay good bye to Jeff Webber and the rest of the USA Today executives who live in that ivory tower. Paulson, Moon, Wilson...all of them should go! They can take the Gannett CEO Martore with them too!
ReplyDeleteI just wonder abut the mental state of Rupert Murdoch. does he have what Ronald Reagan had. Or someone is ether mascaraing as RM, or a hacker, is making major decisions, pretending to be RM. I came not trust the WSJ editorial content anymore>
ReplyDelete