A Gannett Blog reader says in an e-mail that morale problems at the Courier-Post's newsroom go far beyond L'Affaire Poopgate. "In the past couple months, the newsroom has lost four news reporters, a sports reporter, a copy desk staffer and a photographer without anyone being hired,'' the reader says. "Just the other day, it was announced that an assistant metro editor is leaving."But wait, there's more! "For the past few weeks, two editors, the metro/business editor and special sections editor, who are husband and wife, have been missing in action. Where are they? No one knows, but it's clear they aren't returning to the paper. No one knows if they quit or got fired because management has been quiet on the situation. But this leaves three departments without their boss and lowers morale even more. . . .
"The Courier-Post has a very proud tradition and the majority of the newsroom cares deeply about the product we publish. We just need someone new to come in and right the ship. Our current managers have shown that they can't do this."
[Image: this morning's Courier-Post, Newseum]
Hey, stop whining.
ReplyDeleteJust read that profit margins were up 23 percent at Gannett. Those cutbacks are working.
And once they're down to one reporter and one editor at each paper, the money's really going to roll in for those shareholders, I mean, readers.
We should all be bowing to the corporate gods for making life so fulfilling for us all.
Thank goodness I escaped from my Gannett captures a few years ago.
meant Gannett captors, of course.
ReplyDeleteI'm sorry, but I laughed hard enough to fart (and, no, I'm not the mystery pooper) when I read that last bit o' genius that "The Courier-Post has a very proud tradition and the majority of the newsroom cares deeply about the product we publish." Bull. I have worked there for years and for years people have complained about the same stuff - management, being overworked and underpaid, not being listened to, how no one else cares except for them. It comes and goes in peaks and valleys and, true, this is the lowest morale I've seen in a long time, but I was raised in a family with good, hard work ethics and the majority of the coworkers here are lazy, whiny and looking to point fingers at others (and not just management, they like to leave out the backstabbing of peers when they're blogging about how pristine and happy we all were Once Upon A Time).
ReplyDeleteThere's not enough realists in our newsroom. Instead, there's a bunch of emotional hotheads who probably are the ones who planted the poop to begin with, then turn around and point fingers at others saying, "Who did that?" I wish everyone would just come clean and talk about what's going on openly. Every day is such a drag and not just because of the figurative crap going on with management and the literal crap going on at various points in the bathroom. It's lousy because the same people who honor themselves and pat themselves on the back for being such good folks and being so dedicated are mean to others who don't think exactly like they do and self-righteous to boot. I thought this was supposed to be a newspaper where we could all share ideas and reflect the community. Instead, it's some sort of communist camp where a slim majority of dummies are trying to get their agenda pushed through by use of poop tactics and whatever other stupid means they have. If people actually cared about work, they wouldn't be doing something so stupid as defecating on the floor. Banal and immature.
Its not just the newsroom. The systems department is down to about half what it was 18 months ago due to retirements, people jumping ship and the unannounced elimination of the systems director's position. The HR director was let go after 30+ years. Many of the young promising salespeople are jumping ship. The circulation department is in shambles because the former director took the experienced people with him to the Inquirer. There is no mention of rotten morale from any of the management, publisher included. He just fiddles while we burn and while the paper shrinks away. Is there a way to express no confidence in management other than leaving crap on the floor?
ReplyDeleteDude, you need to trim about five inches out of your rant. You think this is the New York Times blog? DUH! It's Gannett Blog!
ReplyDeleteCommunist camp? Joyce, is that you?
ReplyDeleteOne of the most interesting things I've personally heard was a comment made by a top editor a few months back concerning the lack of staff, yet continually growing workload. When someone alerted this editor that they had worked damn near 50 hours and was planning to spend some time in the office during the weekend, the editor calmly stated "we all need to sacrifice."
ReplyDeleteUh, yeah, about the whole sacrifice thing, ummm, I don't believe that's in our job descriptions and I know I certainly ain't no newsroom messiah. And sorry, but that 2%-yearly-sweetened Kool Aid you call a raise doesn't exactly inspire sacrifice, unless you consider how much our families have to sacrifice.
But that's the mentality. It's no wonder the paper has hemorrhaged talented folks, and educated and cultured people have decided that pooping on the floor is a necessary newsroom catharsis.
I would love to see a copy of that letter sent to corporate.
And here's to an expeditious resolve to this matter so us grunts can go back to doing what we do best. Pooping. Uh, I meant scooping.
If your school is approached by the Gannett/USA Today Collegiate Readership Program, I hope that you will consider this: They want to steal your college newspaper advertisers! They will use their newspapers on your campus to financially beat your college newspaper into submission. They can sell ads to your advertisers at a ridiculously low rate for a while to alienate your advertisers. They can sell local advertising with local advertiser inserts. They can even create customized coupon books that are inserted in the local and national papers they provide for your campus readers- Just another clever way to steal your college newspaper advertisers. If your paper has potential for profit, they will offer to buy your paper based on a multiple of your greatly reduced ad revenue. They may find it necessary just to eliminate your paper all together.
ReplyDeleteUSA Today Collegiate Readership Program has flatly denied that they are targeting college newspapers- If that is the case why are they lobbying almost every college and university in the United States, sometimes for years, to get their papers on your campus?
The USA Today Collegiate Readership Program has been cleverly marketed to colleges and universities across the country as a way to enlighten our students and improve the journalism skills of the campus newspaper writers. On Feb. 15, 2008 a joint initiative called Quadrantone was announced by Gannett, The Tribune Newspapers, Hearst Corp and the New York Times. This program creates an unprecedented on line advertising platform that will allow this newly formed oligopoly to offer localized on line advertising on their member online newspaper websites to local advertisers who have relied on the college newspaper to reach students. With Quadrantone, even the on line editorial content can be customized to reach different demographic groups.
Here is the bottom line- This USA Today program is nothing more than a surreptitious way to curry favor with students and administrators under the guise of providing a valuable educational service to our community. Make no mistake about it. The goal of the USA Today readership program is not to enlighten our students and broaden their perspectives as they would have you believe. Their sneaky plan involves bringing USA Today and usually the New York Times on campus along with the local metropolitan newspaper (usually a Gannett publication)- often “free of charge” to the students but paid for by the college administration or student government association. That way the program can count all of their newspapers on campus as paid circulation to justify ad rate increases. The typical metropolitan newspaper is written on an 8th grade reading level. Is that the kind of education and enlightenment that our students can look forward too?
Once the USA Today Collegiate Readership program gets the local metropolitan newspaper on the college campuses, their goal is to steal college newspaper advertisers by offering below market display ad rates to local advertisers and below market on line ad rates through the Quadrantone platform. Gannett and the other large newspaper conglomerates share a common goal- put the college newspapers out of business or buy them for a fraction of what they are worth.
Why are they doing this? The average age of today’s metropolitan newspaper reader is 56 years old! The newspaper industry has the same dilemma as the tobacco industry. Their older customers are hooked but the new generation is not buying. When today’s readers die, so goes their readership. Therefore, to survive, Gannett and the other Quadrantone members are aggressively trying to establish a foothold on college campuses.
A few days after the local metropolitan paper and the two national papers are made available for free in nice shiny racks on the college campus, the multitude of ad reps for the local metropolitan paper and Quadrantone will be calling on every local business within a 10-mile radius of the campus and they will of course call EVERY national advertiser that has used the local college paper in the last 5 years. They will offer the college newspaper advertiser a display ad rate so low that the advertiser will jump ship. Now that Quadrantone can offer locally targeted online advertising, the college newspapers that have local online advertising revenue will no longer be able to compete.
"Citizen Kane" is often considered by movie critics to be the best
>movie EVER PRODUCED.
"Citizen Kane" is a 1941 mystery/drama film. Released by RKO Pictures,
it was the first feature film directed by Orson Welles. The story
traces the life and career of Charles Foster Kane, a man whose career
in the publishing world is born of idealistic social service, but
gradually evolves into a ruthless pursuit of power."- Wikipedia
It supposedly centers around the life of William Randolph Hearst, the
undisputed giant in the newspaper industry in the early 1900's. He
tried everything he could to ban the movie from reaching the theaters
and almost succeeded. If you want to see what corporate greed in the
newspaper industry looks like, watch the movie.
But don't worry. When all looks lost, Gannett or some other newspaper giant might come to the rescue and buy out your college newspaper if it has the potential for profit. If not, they will just kill it by practically giving away their ads to the college market advertisers. If the college paper gets bought out, the students that are left now work for a huge multimedia conglomerate, and they can kiss goodbye the editorial freedom they have taken for granted.
If the students start working for Gannett, they better not say something that Gannett does not agree with in the college paper, especially when it comes to politics. Study Gannett’s political mindset and commit it to memory or risk being shown the door. Gannett knows how the game is played. Gannett has already bought an independent college newspaper in Florida and is about to buy another student newspaper in Colorado. This is just the beginning. The alarming fact is that the USA Today Collegiate Readership Program marketers have duped students and their administrators into thinking that their motives are purely altruistic. That should insult the collective intelligence of our future leaders.
The student newspaper, the last bastion of true freedom of expression in the print media, is slowly being destroyed by a modern day Citizen Kane.
The husband and wife came in on a Saturday, packed up their stuff and left. Morale is definately at an all time low. Everyone I talk to are looking for new jobs.
ReplyDeleteUSA Today and other Newspaper conglomerate Collegiate Readership Programs have flatly denied in print articles that they want to steal your college newspaper readers. “Gannett dismissed any suggestion that it planned to conquer student journalism.
ReplyDelete"There is no grand Gannett strategy," said Tara Connell, a spokeswoman at its headquarters in McLean, Va. "Gannett is not looking to buy college newspapers. We look at all sorts of things." (quoted in numerous online publications)
Oh really? Read this article from The Rocky Mountain Collegian on Mar. 7.
http://media.www.collegian.com/media/storage/paper864/news/2008/03/07/News/Gannett.Csu.Turned.Down.Sale.Of.Collegian.Partnership.Dismissed-3258500.shtml
Excerpt from the University of Alabama Crimson and White online 2/13/08:
“Barbara Hall, the USA Today representative who coordinated the UA (university of Alabama) program, said USA Today is trying to create a "learning environment on the University campus through the reading of newspapers."
"If they're only interested in increasing student readership, why doesn't [USA Today] just give away the papers for free?" Isom (from the Crimson and White) asked.
“Asked that question, Hall said she did not know, except that newspapers cost money to produce and distribute. She said, however, that USA Today is more for businessmen and that the paper "is not going after the college market anytime in the near future." End of quote (Crimson White Online- 2/13 /08)
Remember- only paid circulation is recognized by the Audit Bureau of Circulation- the oversight organization that verifies circulation numbers that newspapers use to increase their ad rates. That Mrs. Hall, is why you can’t give away your newspapers, but of course you knew that already didn’t you? Just another example of the double talk that Gannett is known for.
By the way- it is generally accepted that the USA Today Collegiate Readership program was started at Penn State. USA today would have us believe (per their website) that Penn State hatched the idea and USA today blessed it. Following is a link to an article published in 1989- 8 years before the "first USA today readership program."
http://www.computer-business-review.com/article_cg.asp?guid=63A19049-91C9-4ACB-B52F-114578D44C62
If they are not interested in acquiring college newspapers or “partnering,” why are large newspaper corporations lobbying almost every college and university in the United States, sometimes for years, to get their papers on your campus? Every free paper on your campus takes readers and advertisers away from your college newspaper. One can only read so many newspapers.
Sincerely,
A. Rooney