data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d5e8/6d5e8baa0f13fedbc467a26c53806eab575b4727" alt=""
Lesson here: There's a real cost in labor to run a website well when you open it to the free-for-all that follows with full reader interaction. As newsroom staffs shrink, something's got to give.
An independent journal about the Gannett Co. and the news industry's digital transition
Jim says: "Proceed with caution; this is a free-for-all comment zone. I try to correct or clarify incorrect information. But I can't catch everything. Please keep your posts focused on Gannett and media-related subjects. Note that I occasionally review comments in advance, to reject inappropriate ones. And I ignore hostile posters, and recommend you do, too."
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
As someone who works in digital media and does that same job, I'd say the lesson to be taken from this shouldn't be "newspapers shouldn't have forums and user-generated content online" but rather "newspapers should just let users moderate their own content and communities".
ReplyDeleteUGC is the web right now and to not do it would be a huge mistake. But this old-fashioned over-control of said submissions by uptight newsroom managers takes too much time and frankly, isn't worth the effort.