Thursday, January 17, 2008

Currie: Sound journalism over 'shouting matches'

Newspaper Division Senior Vice President Phil Currie could have been talking about unmoderated comments and other such reader-generated content when he wrote today about political punditry run amok in the just-out issue of News Watch:

"If the responsible operations can't change the current process -- and it is doubtful that all of this is going away -- then they must work hard to help the public see the difference between shouting matches and sound journalism, and underscore that the second version -- while perhaps not quite as visually or viscerally entertaining -- in the long run is far more informative and important to us all."

Use this link to e-mail feedback, tips, snarky letters, etc. See Tipsters Anonymous Policy in the sidebar, upper right. Or leave a note in the comments section, below.

[Image: this morning's Detroit Free Press. Two days after the Michigan presidential primary, the paper says: "Even though seven out of 10 African Americans did not vote for Sen. Hillary Clinton in Michigan's Democratic presidential primary, analysts and black voters don't see it as a sign of irreversible trouble for Clinton if she becomes the party's nominee."]

No comments:

Post a Comment

Jim says: "Proceed with caution; this is a free-for-all comment zone. I try to correct or clarify incorrect information. But I can't catch everything. Please keep your posts focused on Gannett and media-related subjects. Note that I occasionally review comments in advance, to reject inappropriate ones. And I ignore hostile posters, and recommend you do, too."

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.