data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc8ee/dc8ee910f293c0889f92b22bfaa7aebc5e537693" alt=""
This chart compares the stock performance of Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. vs. Gannett since the start of the year. The blue line is News Corp. Gannett is red. You get the picture. More on that unpleasantness later in the post.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b71f/5b71f701cd2bd0d7f8ba00a145464e0bf1a72170" alt=""
First: I'm flat-out envious of the folks at News Corp. -- even with my qualms about CEO Murdoch's rapacious appetite. But as people keep saying: The man loves newspapers. And he also embraces
Web 2.0 in ways I'm not sure
Gannett is willing to try. Just today, News Corp.'s Fox Entertainment Group said it had
acquired social-network
Beliefnet, a site devoted to spirituality and religion. Murdoch is adding that to a digital stable that includes
MySpace, the hugely successful investment that made him one of the oldest
webpreneurs.
It'll be interesting to compare his web strategy with the one
Gannett executives are
scheduled to discuss Wednesday morning during a conference with Wall Street media stock analysts. And that's just the digital side of a competition between News Corp. and
Gannett that's now moving into higher gear.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27f8b/27f8b298afceca9ee84334d88f4c2ee9d8098f22" alt=""
Murdoch (
left) has made clear several
ambitions with his purchase of Dow Jones & Co., publisher of the
Wall Street Journal. He wants to make access to the
Journal's website free; that would boost its audience considerably -- at the expense of other newspaper websites. Second, he wants to give the
Journal a jolt of non-financial news so it has a more national reach. He's especially focused on Washington political coverage (watch out,
New York Times!) and popular culture (get ready,
USA Today!).
And if Murdoch came knocking with the right price, perhaps
Gannett's board would be willing to talk about
USA Today. Romenesko
noted three months ago that John Hartman, who's written two books about
USA Today, said Murdoch had reportedly offered to buy it a decade ago for $1 billion. Murdoch's
USA Today could go full-tilt with Fleet Street-ish celebrity coverage in ways unsuitable at the
Journal.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37e4e/37e4e8624656dd08914dd7d13deee83f07778987" alt=""
Even in a year when newspaper stocks have been getting pounded, News Corp. has done relatively OK,
Google Finance data show. Its
shares are down only 5.2% year-to-date vs. a 40.9% dive bomb in
Gannett shares. (Smelling salts, anyone?) And that's part of why News Corp.'s market value is so much bigger than other, more newspaper-centric companies like
Gannett.
I've been watching
Gannett's market capitalization (chart,
above) fall $100 million here and $200 million there for weeks now; these figures are as of today's closing stock prices. (Just curious: Does it matter to anyone in the
Gannett Tower if the Washington Post Co. overtakes
Gannett's market cap?)
E-mail feedback, link suggestions, tips, snarky letters, etc.; see Tipsters Anonymous Policy in the sidebar, upper right. Or leave a note in the comments section, below.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Jim says: "Proceed with caution; this is a free-for-all comment zone. I try to correct or clarify incorrect information. But I can't catch everything. Please keep your posts focused on Gannett and media-related subjects. Note that I occasionally review comments in advance, to reject inappropriate ones. And I ignore hostile posters, and recommend you do, too."
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.