Monday, November 26, 2007

Growing signs Gannett in broad job downsizing

With its revenue and stock slumping, the company is quietly engaged in a far-reaching round of buyouts and job cuts across the country, based on recent published news accounts and reader mail I've gotten. Absent a big change in advertising revenue, I suspect staff reductions will continue into next year and beyond. The intriguing question: Is Corporate's top brass at the gleaming Virginia headquarters (above) also taking a hit?

USA Today certainly has. Management just announced plans to reduce newsroom employment by 45 jobs -- nearly 9% -- in one of the bigger cuts I've seen at any newspaper. The situation is looking desperate when Gannett whacks employment that much at one of the few papers with growing circulation. Yet, USA Today is only the latest. Look at what's happening in Cincinnati; Reno; Detroit; Nashville; Indianapolis; Burlington, Vt., and Phoenix. (Got one I missed? Send me details with story and/or memo links.)

Senior executives told Wall Street last month that more severance expenses are likely by the end of this year, suggesting more job cutting. But they didn't give a precise number or say where the trims would fall. That may explain investors' growing impatience with GCI's efforts to boost earnings and its stock price.

CEO Craig Dubow was similarly vague when he told employees in September about the company's ongoing "transformation'' and the pain it would cause. "Will we be structured like we are now? I doubt it,'' Dubow wrote. "Will we have more or fewer newspapers and TV stations than we have now? That depends, but we're working on finding the right portfolio."

The nation's top newspaper publisher employed 49,675 people earlier this year, public documents show. (See chart, left; click on it for a bigger view.) This year's annual Form 10-K, filed March 1, showed overall employment fell nearly 6% in the previous 12 months. My hunch is that we'll see an even bigger drop when GCI files its next 10-K with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in the spring. As that chart shows, Gannett's employment peaked at 53,400 workers in early 2001, reflecting acquisitions the previous year, including The Indianapolis Star. Still, even with last year's cuts, Gannett has many more employees than it did in 1994, the last year for which I could easily find 10-Ks disclosing employment levels.

One big mystery: What's happening at Corporate's offices? As well-paid executives there order everyone else to do more with less, are they also reducing Corporate's staffing and taking on more work themselves? Have they given up catered lunch on china for a soggy sandwich from the cafeteria? What about those six-figure bonuses and seven-figure goodbye kisses?

Corporate employed 600 people in early 2005 -- the last year GCI disclosed headcount at headquarters, based on my review of 10-Ks. Curiously, that figure wasn't provided in the two most recent filings.

Update: With the help of a Gannett Blog tipster, I was able to solve the mystery here.

[Data: SEC forms 10-K]

5 comments:

  1. The job cuts through outright firings and buyouts are dramatic but I think the actual number of newsroom job losses is much higher.
    Is there any way to track the number or people who are leaving the industry to pursue other things? At the Gannett unit I work at, a lot of folks are just plain quitting and they are, for the most part, not being replaced.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I keep seeing the USA Today newsroom cuts mentioned, but nothing about the business-side cuts at the paper. Those people lost jobs too, and their "parting gifts" were not as nice as the newsroom's...

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is a great question, from the comment above: Is there any way to track the number or people who are leaving the industry to pursue other things?

    Answer: Sort of. I know where that data is kept, but it's as much as five years old. Still, it could be interesting. I'll see if I can track it down. Does anyone else know a better answer?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yes, look at your outlook email address book. You can learn quite a bit from it

    :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. People always hate to talk about when they are laid off. But as it has become every day's news headline since Yahoo started it with cutting 1500 of its task force last year, now a need of platform has been in demand where people can express their selves in words how they are feeling about their company, whey the got laid off was that justified or not.
    And every thing they want to tell anonymously.And www.layoffgossip.com is providing you that platform.

    ReplyDelete

Jim says: "Proceed with caution; this is a free-for-all comment zone. I try to correct or clarify incorrect information. But I can't catch everything. Please keep your posts focused on Gannett and media-related subjects. Note that I occasionally review comments in advance, to reject inappropriate ones. And I ignore hostile posters, and recommend you do, too."

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.