USA Today told news staffers yesterday that industry realities required the company to cut 45 jobs, notes the Guardian's Roy Greenslade. But, the British blogger asks: "Did those 'economic realities' point to Gannett's continuing profitability? Did talk of those 'realities' mention the company's huge past profits, or its commitment to a high profit margin?"
Good questions! USA Today employees: Was that part of the agenda yesterday? Please E-mail Gannett Blog -- or leave a note in the comments section, below.
Friday, November 16, 2007
1 comment:
Jim says: "Proceed with caution; this is a free-for-all comment zone. I try to correct or clarify incorrect information. But I can't catch everything. Please keep your posts focused on Gannett and media-related subjects. Note that I occasionally review comments in advance, to reject inappropriate ones. And I ignore hostile posters, and recommend you do, too."
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
What about the employees outside of editorial who are losing their jobs? Are they getting buyouts, too? I doubt it...
ReplyDelete