A reader has provided the text to an online survey Corporate is now asking employees to complete. Assuming I've copied and pasted correctly, the questions appear below, starting with the introduction.
Please note the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements. If you feel you are not in a position to make a judgment about any statements, please select the "I don't know/ Not applicable" option.
Please note the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements. If you feel you are not in a position to make a judgment about any statements, please select the "I don't know/ Not applicable" option.
- We will have to enter new businesses / make new investments to continue to be successful
- We will have to improve the overall quality and relevance of our content
- We will have to improve operations / cost-effectiveness across business units
- We will have to enhance our capabilities as a provider of local marketing products and services
- We will have to find the most effective way for consumers to pay for content (i.e. new content subscription models)
- Gannett has a clear growth strategy that is understood by employees
- The transformation initiatives underway adequately address the business challenges facing the company
- The Gannett Management Committee recognizes that Gannett needs to fundamentally change the way we operate to achieve future growth
- The Gannett Management Committee shares a clear and explicit vision for the transformation
- People within my division recognize that we need to change the way we operate to ensure our future success
- My supervisor shares a clear and explicit vision for the transformation
- I clearly understand the overall strategy of Gannett's transformation
- Our consumers (e.g. readers, viewers) believe that Gannett needs to undergo significant change in order to better meet their needs
- Our business customers (e.g. advertisers) believe that Gannett needs to undergo significant change in order to better meet their needs
- I believe the transformation will deliver sustainable performance improvement and profitability for Gannett
- I believe the transformation will lead to long-term growth for Gannett
- We will be seen as the market leader in the media industry with this transformation
- The Gannett Management Committee will ensure obstacles to executing the transformation are removed
- This commitment will receive the active support of middle and senior managers
- The appropriate people will be deployed to the transformation effort – versus those resources that are simply available
- Workload will be rebalanced to reflect the additional burden associated with the transformation
- We have a good track record in executing major projects
- We have the necessary skills in my area to deliver the required changes and execute the transformation
- I am confident I will receive the support I need from my manager to implement the required changes for the transformation
- We are making moves to change our culture to support the open, two-way communication necessary to make the change happen
- We will not lose the initial momentum on the transformation – we will carry on until we feel that the transformation is a success
- Our consumers (e.g. readers, viewers) believe that we will be able to successfully execute the transformation
- Our business customers (e.g. advertisers) believe that we will be able to successfully execute the transformation
A question for you:
ReplyDeleteIn the text I received, it appears the survey assumes widespread knowledge of the Gannett Management Committee and its responsibilities.
Did the survey define that committee? Without following the link I provided above, do you know the committee's membership and general duties?
sub "relevance" for "responsibilities" ....
ReplyDeleteWonder why the distinction between readers/viewers, who are twice referred to as "consumers" and advertisers, who are called "business customers."
ReplyDeleteOne thing for sure: there is no implied relationship with consumers.
Inspired. More kool-aid, please....
ReplyDeleteAnd I thought management could not further stray from reality. What a load of bullshit.
ReplyDeleteNo, it did not explain who they were. I just visualized everyone from the post-investor meeting dog and pony show.
ReplyDeleteNo and no. All my managers convey are orders to cover their butts.
ReplyDeleteWho the fuck designed these questionnaires?
ReplyDeletetypo. 18 and 19 meant to say YOU will be removed.
ReplyDeleteI wonder how the burden will be shared at USA today when actual 1st Q results come out? Certainly not those who aren't doing the work now. I know of a dozen editors and twice as many reporters who do little more than shuffle papers and write important emails all day. Digital? Even more dead weight. We could out source their work to India.
ReplyDeleteAnd speaking of people who seem not to do anything, what about the digital and verticals "executives"?
Regarding question No. 9, in 2-3 sentences, please describe the "transformation," and how Gannett is trying to accomplish it.
ReplyDeleteRe #20. Do you smell reapplying for jobs? Sure sounds like it. Who thinks Gannett is capable of a "transformation" that would seriously give our readers what they want to read or a product that our advertisers really want to spend their money on. The big G bigwigs are so full of themselves.
ReplyDeleteOK. This is not about journalism or "readers". GCI hopes to be an ad network. Readers don't generate revenue. "Clicks" and page views generate revenue. Amish ovens - whatever. You may be pure of heart. But advertising is cash. This is what they're trying - and failing to be. Love it - or move on. You've seen the future... Just don't deny it exists. Anyway - where's Rudd? It's his strategy.
ReplyDeleteThis is one of those clever
ReplyDeletereverse psychology things that makes you believe you are part of the decision making process , when you are not . Management is actually laughing at you thinking about the answers.
They are just trying to brainwash you with their ideas which still lead to lay-offs in the end .
Actually, this seems like a good mood survey, finding out if your bosses are showing any signs of doing what is expected of them.
ReplyDeleteI'm betting that geographic trends in the survey could help them decide if leadership is doing needed work.
The way the preamble of the survey is crafted and the combination of questions and IP address makes it possible to narrow the identity of the person down to a specific supervisor, even down the employee. So the choice is be truthful and have it filed away for future ambush at layoff time, or answer the questions exactly the way it's clear they want them to be answered. I'd like for my paychecks to continue awhile longer. Let the beatings continue, please.
ReplyDeleteI repeat my question from the previous day, who is REALLY going to fill this out with any honest and candor, without fearing reprisal? I don't trust these people in corporate any further than I can throw a truck.
ReplyDeleteDon't be such a drama queen
DeleteI filled it out honestly and just went off. The small chance that they are completely lying about anonymity and it will come back on me was far outweighed by the satisfaction of telling them how it really is among the rank and file when they ask us to be candid. People cowering in fear at every chance to speak their minds only allows the suits to continue their blissful ignorance. All you people who won't even complain when they invite to, is your paycheck worth that much self respect?
ReplyDeleteGlad to hear this. I too answered as honestly as I could.
DeleteI did say I was unclear of who was on the Gannett Management committee.
Jim, it's all about digital. That's the transformation. All hands are on the digital deck.
ReplyDeleteWe have corporate person and a marketing firm calling in sales reps to ask them about their managers and VPS and who they think is a good or bad manager and or VP and why plus tons of other questions. They have been at our site all week.
ReplyDeleteNancy Solliday and the Winthrop Group? They are making their way across Gannett.
DeleteI think 9:04 has it about right: "GCI hopes to be an ad network."
ReplyDeleteYoung Gannett employee here. Should I answer these honestly or as they want to hear? Can I get kickback from being honest?
ReplyDeleteRespectfully, you have a lot to learn. They would love to have you vomit up their line of bullshit. And, it is all bullshit. As you will learn (the hard way) Gannett doesn't give a shot about you or anyone else.
DeleteAnswer the questions. Be honest. Don't be foolish and unnecessarily inflamatory. But answer the questions directly. That's what I did. If that gets me fired, I can live with it. Sure, the questions are dumb and off point. But they deserve to hear from the trenches, even though they won't like it.
ReplyDeleteAre you really so naive to believe that if you answer the survey honestly and say something negative that there be no "kickback" as you say?
ReplyDeleteFreedom of speech at Gannett is selective. They select when you have the capability and privilege. And for all the IT people on here who say they cannot trace your survey, you are full of you know what. The last survey I was one of the very last people to complete it and I kept getting emails asking me to do so. If it was sent out as a general message and not trackable, it certainly tracked it to my computer.
What a ridiculous survey. 28 questions, really? Should be half that number.
ReplyDeleteThere should be one survey for managers, one for journalists and yet another for people in support operations (IT, pressroom, circ, etc).
What a weak-minded survey with its passive-aggressive tone and lame ass "messaging" to the staff.
I was with the company nearly 15 and not once did I understand Gannett's goals nor were they outlined for me. Yes, the big goal was making money, but in recent years no one ever outlined the goals of print vs. online and why and where we needed to go with that.
ReplyDeleteI always felt that outside of profit, the company had no real vision for the future and that accelerated with McCorkindale and then landed like a turd at a cocktail party with Dubrow.
No. 26 is an absolute joke. 26.
ReplyDelete"We will not lose the initial momentum on the transformation – we will carry on until we feel that the transformation is a success."
Um, News2000, Real Life, Real News, Local Information Center, All-American contests, target young people, target old people, target minorities (OK, that's still going on).
So, where are all these great ideas now? On the scrap heap, because the initial momentum got lost. And why did the initial momentum get lost? Because these ideas were horrible to begin with.
Heres how you truly transform if you want to cut costs and boost profitability while improving the quality and quantity of content.
ReplyDeleteGet rid of all unnecessary managers who don't edit or process content.
Get rid of digital people whose only tasks are technical and cannot make sound editorial decisions due to a lack of experience.
Train the older, actual journalists to be technically capable all thing digital so posting/processing becomes second nature.
This brings you speed to market by removing layers of bureaucratic, needless management. It keeps more experienced content providers in place, sustaining breadth of experience on a national level at USA Today and locally for that Hometown Advantage. And it substantially lowers editorial costs.
Carrying on is not a management practice I've ever heard of. And is success based on how "management feels" a true measure of actual success? Whats next? Management mood rings?
ReplyDeleteConsider that GCI's first digital offering, USA TODAY Update, launched in 1984. Seems late in the day to fret about losing momentum.
ReplyDeleteOne has to wonder which genius came up with this survey, which will undoubtedly result in many field trips to the Gannett frontier to reiterate ill conceived, half baked plans divorced from reality.Because, of course, the rank and file doesn't buy into a transformation plan no one has actually articulated.
ReplyDeleteTell everyone in USA today's sports department how reapplying for their jobs is transformative. Tom Beusse never told us.
ReplyDeleteSad thing is, there are still a few people left in McLean who know how to write and analyze surveys properly. Far fewer than there were previously, but enough to ensure that this pile of poo did not see the light of day.
ReplyDeleteIf, of course, someone had bothered to ask them.
This provoked another eye-rolling session at my site but not much attempt at analysis. The takeaway among rank-and-file reporters: Corporate doesn't care what we think and will do whatever it wants. We're prepared for some form of bad news in the next two to four weeks (although we have nothing solid on which to base this feeling). On a positive note, reporters are using the iPhones effectively for breaking news, but cell service provider (Sprint) sucks in terms of signal strength and availability in our market.
ReplyDelete9:55 PM "The way the preamble of the survey is crafted and the combination of questions and IP address makes it possible to narrow the identity of the person down to a specific supervisor, even down the employee."
ReplyDeleteSeriously, I know things are bad at Gannett but please take a few minutes to understand how technology works before spouting off such uninformed nonsense.
All Gannett traffic comes from the same IP at each location. There is no way to link individual users to a survey response.
USA today is in a huge financial bind. Swelling payroll costs, declining ad base and circulation sagging again. Shakeup is coming beyond Sports. Senior staff meetings will be called before end of first quarter to address the situation. Lots of thing on the table, but more conjecture than concrete plans until Hunke gets approval from Gracia. But all the bs about improving the product is just lip service. Digital will get more power, but it's people have none of the intellectual depth to improve prove the product beyond cosmetics.. Think of multiple Sarah Palins as HBO portrays her in Game Change.
ReplyDeleteSo do these get fed directly into the shredder? I'm more than certain nothing will come of the results, so why even bother?
ReplyDeleteI was brutally honest....let them fire me.
ReplyDeleteThey will!
DeleteHmmm...never got the survey in Appleton. So I'll just consider it an ominous sign.
ReplyDeleteSurvey only went out to active payroll as of the beginning of Q2.
ReplyDelete11:35, I've been on the active payroll for 15+ years.
ReplyDeleteI answered the survey questions suspecting that the code embedded in the email would make it possible to trace my answers back to me. I answered because I think it's important that Martore and others in the Crystal Palace know how we (worker bees) feel. I wasn't snarky or disrespectful. I was honest. If they want to fire or punish me for that so be it.
ReplyDeleteI got the survey in Appleton, and a followup yesterday reminding me to fill it out. Trouble is, we're too busy to take the time for a survey.
ReplyDeleteI got the survey but saw the word "leadership" and couldn't stop laughing. I hit delete key and went back to work on something more productive.
ReplyDeleteI'd make a copy of your answers, just in case.....
ReplyDeleteIt read like something you would recite at Catholic Church.
12:32 - Q2 starts next Monday - maybe you aren't on the active payroll then.
ReplyDeleteIsn't having BCG do the survey a conflict of interest (at least gives the appearance)?
ReplyDeleteI'm curious if people answered this on company time or their own. Before I was downsized back in June, there was no way I could take the time to do this while on the clock due to the dozens of daily mandates that had to be met.
ReplyDeleteIm giving a speech on company time, so ill have to do the survey On The Road. Just call me Charles Kuralt.
ReplyDelete9:36 AM. Your asinine response actually proved the writer's point. IP address identifies the site. The combination of years worked, level within organization and department make it obvious in any department smaller than 30 employees who the respondent is. If you're answering outside the Gannett network, then IP is what the company uses in its web metrics for determining approximate location. So either way they know what city you're responding from. So what was that you said about understanding how technology works? Time to put your typewriter-thingy-with-a-screen away
ReplyDeleteActually, 9:36, 7:29 and 9:55, the response from 1:09 p.m. is closer to the truth. If you look at the SurveyMonkey FAQs, they list all sorts of ways for a survey to appear anonymous but allow for tracking of respondents. Search under "How can I track the names and emails of respondents." Also see in the FAQs that the default is to collect IP addresses and client email address. Look at the source under the page and see how many encrypted hidden fields they're using. 7:29 is also correct. One of their suggestions is leading questions that narrow the identity of the respondent. So, 9:36, you just go right ahead with your myth of anonymity.
ReplyDeleteThank you, 7:55. I've administered Survey Monkey on behalf of my non-Gannett company. Believe me, I know who responded and their comments.
ReplyDeleteSo much fear.
ReplyDeleteSad.
at this point we are on a sinking ship. people need to speak up so we can find a way to plug this bitch before we are all under water
ReplyDeleteJust getting back to this blog after enjoying life post -Garnett.
ReplyDeleteQuestion: was dubow ever forced to operationalize or define transformation?
Being someone who knows how firewalls work, and someone who knows how SurveyMonkey works, I have to agree with 9:36. Further I can say hat 7:55 and 7:58 not only appear to be the same person, but also have no idea what he or she is talking about. Just an attempt to spread misinformation to those who dont know better.
ReplyDeleteGuess again 2:39, or should I say 9:26. And it's clear you don't know how either work because you choose not to read what is posted right in SurveyMonkey FAQ. But you just keep on shoveling it for the company. Instead of going to buy yourself a clue, send Jim a contribution instead.
ReplyDelete2:39 here, and no, I'm not 9:36. People complain all the time about corporate shills coming on here to try to discredit others or Jim. Yet you have no problem doing the same thing in reverse by spreading misinformation. Why the hypocrisy?
ReplyDeleteThey enjoy spreading misinformation. They don't have to take responsibility for it, and Jim doesn't call them on it.
ReplyDeleteParanoia will destroy ya.
ReplyDeleteAnd here I was thinking that big companies were starting to have some common sense :\
ReplyDelete