tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8099437767970534324.post5597902998949924815..comments2023-11-05T06:26:51.316-05:00Comments on Gannett Blog: I can't imagine Gannett toppling a governmentJim Hopkinshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16712746705871119746noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8099437767970534324.post-77553895648043570372011-02-02T13:44:37.173-05:002011-02-02T13:44:37.173-05:00Yeah, 11:58 a.m., did you even bother to read the ...Yeah, 11:58 a.m., did you even bother to read the media bistro story?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8099437767970534324.post-66393580769106958982011-02-02T13:42:12.212-05:002011-02-02T13:42:12.212-05:00Why is that so immensely stupid, 11:58 a.m.? I jus...Why is that so immensely stupid, 11:58 a.m.? I just looked at the story and the idea is that Gannett puts forth new "initiatives" without backing them up with people and capital.<br /><br />That's not true, according to the story, about publications including "Time."<br /><br />And, at the Journal News in Westchester the management made a huge thing about the need for Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8099437767970534324.post-86366570787939541372011-02-02T11:58:13.019-05:002011-02-02T11:58:13.019-05:00"Check Media Bistro today for a story about m..."Check Media Bistro today for a story about magazines out-twittering the newspapers by substantial margins. It's interesting and goes against the Gannett grain."<br /><br />Yes, that's an indication of success. You are immensely stupid for writing that.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8099437767970534324.post-38822583748507670942011-02-02T11:28:07.612-05:002011-02-02T11:28:07.612-05:00hey dopey 10:58 p.m.....I think relevancy is the i...hey dopey 10:58 p.m.....I think relevancy is the issue here.<br /><br />Gannett newspapers (I'm most familiar with the Journal News in my area) are no longer relevant to people in the community. They're wafer-thin and without substance on a daily basis.<br /><br />You can see the reporters are trying, but there are a lot fewer names now than there were a couple of years ago. Gannett can Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8099437767970534324.post-40591920219977919852011-02-01T22:58:16.254-05:002011-02-01T22:58:16.254-05:00hey dopey Jim....Gannett runs news websites...not ...hey dopey Jim....Gannett runs news websites...not primarily social networking sites....facebook is social networking....different missions! different purposes!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8099437767970534324.post-37569449516970223002011-02-01T22:19:47.883-05:002011-02-01T22:19:47.883-05:00Jim: Don't confuse the tool with the craftsman...Jim: Don't confuse the tool with the craftsman who wields it. We don't credit Blogger with creating Gannett Blog.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8099437767970534324.post-34770194908833321422011-02-01T16:32:34.822-05:002011-02-01T16:32:34.822-05:00Didn't you know that many of the first movemen...Didn't you know that many of the first movements of historical events started on Gannett's moms sites?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8099437767970534324.post-26837354308364851142011-02-01T15:15:49.240-05:002011-02-01T15:15:49.240-05:00Good Question. Does Gannett have the answer? Um, n...Good Question. Does Gannett have the answer? Um, no.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com