tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8099437767970534324.post2071470026086412368..comments2023-11-05T06:26:51.316-05:00Comments on Gannett Blog: Sports Media | ESPN's payoff for a big-league hireJim Hopkinshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16712746705871119746noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8099437767970534324.post-31859232583178174292013-04-08T10:34:15.683-04:002013-04-08T10:34:15.683-04:002:53,
And I find it appealing that Jim didn't ...2:53,<br />And I find it appealing that Jim didn't take a swipe at you after taking your "you suck" comment. Jim not only provides a valuable service for those of us employed by this rag tag outfit, but also shows class on a daily basis. You, on the other hand, are a different story. Back to spin control for you!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8099437767970534324.post-20838004738296614552013-04-07T23:02:05.346-04:002013-04-07T23:02:05.346-04:00A well-educated consumer WANTS to know the deliver...A well-educated consumer WANTS to know the delivery system for his product. A guilt-tripping consumer WANTS to feel that he isn't polluting the planet or wearing the labor of a 10-year-old making a dollar a day. The whole "Green Revolution" is an attempt to make people feel good about consuming. <br /><br />I would argue that people WANT to know the processes by which they get theirAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8099437767970534324.post-90351272792343924642013-04-07T19:10:15.520-04:002013-04-07T19:10:15.520-04:00You lost me. Jim made a mistake, fixed it, and the...You lost me. Jim made a mistake, fixed it, and then someone added a snarky comment. You, posting anonymously, then criticized something -- not sure what. I'm sure the response will be that this post is done anonymously, and that dance could continue forever. But Jim has provided no reason for anyone to post with a name. I think one of the last females foolish enough to post with a name got Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8099437767970534324.post-42367649923436086442013-04-07T18:13:46.950-04:002013-04-07T18:13:46.950-04:00Bold statement from someone hiding anonymously, bu...Bold statement from someone hiding anonymously, bud.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8099437767970534324.post-6709107454772268072013-04-07T14:53:27.150-04:002013-04-07T14:53:27.150-04:00OK, now you can delete that comment. You can keep ...OK, now you can delete that comment. You can keep the part about how you suck if you really want to. I'm sure it will apply to something else.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8099437767970534324.post-13089143410810463932013-04-07T13:02:24.488-04:002013-04-07T13:02:24.488-04:00Thanks for pointing that out; I've fixed it.Thanks for pointing that out; I've fixed it.Jim Hopkinshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16712746705871119746noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8099437767970534324.post-14082384336881468992013-04-07T11:56:53.778-04:002013-04-07T11:56:53.778-04:00Rice has led the coverage of the Rice firing? Haha...Rice has led the coverage of the Rice firing? Hahaha!<br /><br />You suck, Jim.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8099437767970534324.post-8031159966205330352013-04-07T11:21:50.726-04:002013-04-07T11:21:50.726-04:00Given the fact he was being interviewed by a sport...Given the fact he was being interviewed by a sports blog, this Van Natta comment is noteworthy:<br /><br />"I never understood the blogs that dissect the inner workings of newspapers because it feels like so much inside baseball, even to the newspaper journalists being written about. But the endless fascination with sports media including ESPN is something different, and it’s also an easy Jim Hopkinshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16712746705871119746noreply@blogger.com