tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8099437767970534324.post5385055822416241088..comments2023-11-05T06:26:51.316-05:00Comments on Gannett Blog: Big Al | How Feinstein rolled out the red carpetJim Hopkinshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16712746705871119746noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8099437767970534324.post-23177630483161906152013-04-09T13:40:59.706-04:002013-04-09T13:40:59.706-04:00It's from 1984. There were no ethical conduct ...It's from 1984. There were no ethical conduct policies back then.<br /><br />Not that the policies would stop Gannett executives today from violating them. They don't care.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8099437767970534324.post-20771350765580654152013-04-08T18:21:15.000-04:002013-04-08T18:21:15.000-04:00So Rossie likes Feinstein because [a] thirty years...So Rossie likes Feinstein because [a] thirty years ago she kow-towed to a self-avowed corporate s.o.b., and [b] whether out of ignorance or petulance, she refused to engage in a civil discussion of the constitutionality of her dubious gun proposals.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8099437767970534324.post-89608179086959265132013-04-08T16:52:52.504-04:002013-04-08T16:52:52.504-04:00Of course the REAL story here is that an elected o...Of course the REAL story here is that an elected official could be influenced by a wealthy private company to change a policy as an act of favoritism. Why should the Gannett CEO get special tarmack treatment?<br /><br />Also, isn't either the Gannett president or the column writer (or both) clearly in violation of Gannett's own Standards of Ethical Conduct policies in making the request Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com