tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8099437767970534324.post2388285610245211785..comments2023-11-05T06:26:51.316-05:00Comments on Gannett Blog: Sioux Falls | What happened to the 'cleaner' look?Jim Hopkinshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16712746705871119746noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8099437767970534324.post-90695282773468982542011-01-31T07:44:50.628-05:002011-01-31T07:44:50.628-05:008:11PM, no not anymore.8:11PM, no not anymore.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8099437767970534324.post-78833609124857278212011-01-30T20:11:14.131-05:002011-01-30T20:11:14.131-05:00What would happen if Gannett unleashed publishers ...What would happen if Gannett unleashed publishers to innovate and to go for the money they thought they could get with their own mobile/web/app/print strategies with their own risk-taking. Are publishers allowed to be publishers?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8099437767970534324.post-25022788598991495942011-01-30T11:20:26.859-05:002011-01-30T11:20:26.859-05:00National average is around 0.05% (so un-clicked ad...National average is around 0.05% (so un-clicked ads average slightly higher than 99.9%).<br /><br />Interesting: When site skins were still new, Gannett specifically mentioned them as a forbidden ad type in their online advertising policy. They also refused to allow resizing ads (like the sponsorship position that would supersize on mouse over). Likewise, it was verboten to put anything but a Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8099437767970534324.post-4985855248953671562011-01-30T08:16:05.024-05:002011-01-30T08:16:05.024-05:00Hey Jim - did you click on the banner?
No? I d...Hey Jim - did you click on the banner? <br /><br />No? I didn't think so. That's the flaw in counting on the internet as a major source of advertising revenue - people don't click on the ads! Think about it, 99.9% of the time you NEVER click on an internet ad and you think the ads are pain in the ass.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com